After Comic-Con, platforms like the Yahoo community and Facebook took the lead.

Especially those who have experienced it in person can't help but share their joy online, "...it's so well said, one cycle after another, Marvel is going to take a different path, looking forward to " The Avengers"."

"What is the landlord talking about? I don't understand anything. Also, is "The Avengers" a new Marvel movie?"

"Same question, is there something happening that we don't know about."

After a series of question marks at the bottom, another participant appeared and explained: "This is what happened at the Golden State Comic Con yesterday. Marvel has a big move, and it also dissed the DC next door, and announced that "Avengers" will be launched soon. He also said that from "Iron Man 1", "The Incredible Hulk", "Thor", "Captain America" ​​and then "Iron Man 2", the narratives of this series of stages are mutually influenced and interdependent. Wayne unifies these stories into a chapter called Infinite Saga."

"WTF? The more I talk, the more I don't understand it, but the Easter eggs and foreshadowing of the works produced by Marvel are quite coherent. Is this a unified staged narrative?"

"Marvel is amazing. The idea of ​​being able to fit into a framework is even more powerful. Is this the so-called redefinition?"

"I just want to know, who is the dark shadow who spoke to Loki at the end of Thor, and what was the scepter given to him?"

"The concept of the Avengers is in the comics, but if it is to be made into a movie, it is obviously necessary to make adjustments, and the timelines are different. I hope Marvel can improve it."

————

"MCU?"

Universal executive Nasim, who was lying on the boss's chair and listening to the report, sat upright and sighed to himself, "I didn't expect Marvel to have a sensible person. It's a pity, it's a pity, how should you solve the problem of too scattered roles... …”

"Okay, I see, let's go out."

Clearly, Nassim doesn't think Marvel's MCU plans will succeed.

After all, it was Universal that first thought of associated development and put it into action.

Remember that "Van Helsing" movie that failed so badly that Hugh Jackman didn't want to mention it? According to Universal's initial planning, the benefits of their arrangement are obvious and genius ideas——

One of the typical elements of a movie is content creation, and its content production cost is quite high, cannot be pre-controlled, and the risk is still high.

You must know that a movie with an investment of over 100 million may have a box office of over 1 billion, and the naked profit may be less than 10 million, and there will be no underwear left. The gap is always carefully considered by the film company. . Moreover, the success of a film is difficult to replicate completely again, even if it is the same series, this one is a hit, and the next one may fail at the box office.

In other words, every movie can be seen as a separate event, and every movie has to start all over again.

And how did "Van Helsing" do it? Universal's concept is also through the series connection mode, with a main line pulling many screen images that were once hot and then quiet, giving them new value.

The meaning of content filling lies in this, even if "Van Helsing" fails at the box office due to its high cost, but as long as it has a good reputation and fans like it, it can create benefits with the help of the classic images such as Frankenstein, werewolf, and vampire; if "Van Helsing" ” is a big hit at the box office, then the copyrights of other characters are more likely to be successful, because the plots of each other are interrelated and integrated, which transcends the shortcomings of independent films, and each character can also become a carrier for attracting fans to each other.

Then, as we all know, "Van Helsing" failed, with too many characters, and the awkward plot trend without rules also led to criticism from a large number of audiences.

What Nasim said a pity also stemmed from the idea of ​​Marvel and the former Universal to use the connection between the characters to expand the audience carrier, but there are many difficulties and there will be no good results...

————

"It's a good talk and a good idea, but there is no specific result to testify. Let's take a look and see how this game of chess goes."

Columbia's boss Michael Linton held a document detailing the "MCU" plan in his hand, and said to Carlos, the general manager of the production department: "However, the development of the first few projects on Marvel's side has been very smooth. , even if it is screwed up, it will not affect the value that the original character has developed."

"Last night, Lyman called me again to discuss the return of the little spider." Carlos said with some temptation: "They are constantly showing their love, and we may also be able to use the popularity of Marvel to improve the little spider's popularity. Value. Just like what you said, President, Marvel has become a climate, and it may not be a win-win situation, everyone gets what they need."

"Let's take a look." Michael Linton refused. He still had the idea of ​​independent development in his heart, and he would go out without a share. Furthermore, the copyright business of Little Spider involves a lot of melons, not only production. Department, Distribution Department Even the animation department, even for the parent company Sony, attaches great importance to this decision. On a day that relies on external stimulation, there will definitely be other people who will disagree and have to change.

After all, Marvel is not yet strong enough to make people look at it. It can only be said that it has done a good job. Both Lyman and Kevin are leaders with great ability and ideas.

————

"Hmph, it's just a few flukes."

Different from other manufacturers, Warner boss Kevin Tsujihara was angry and complained when he heard the news.

Yes, at the press conference, although Lehman did not go into great detail, everyone knew who the so-called comic circle refers to - filming, refrigerating, and filming again. There are no other examples other than DC. After all, Even if Marvel sells the copyrighted part of the adaptation, it will be after the new millennium.

So when the comic exhibition is over, the hot search will be the comparison of countless versions of Batman that DC has filmed before. Warner definitely doesn't want this topic to be foiled and drained, but it is a fact that cannot be ignored.

Of course, Lehman's wording is not too biased, and although Warner is unhappy, it will not turn his face for a sentence or two.

In the same way, Warner didn't pay too much attention to the planning of "MCU", and the results that have not been confirmed are false to these big manufacturers. The success of "The Alliance of Players" is nothing more than meeting and analyzing, and then copying the market concept.

Think about it, "Avatar" brought the trend of 3D+IMAX to Hollywood, and what "The Avengers" can bring to Hollywood is still unknown...

https://

Genius for a second to remember the address of this site: . Zero-point reading mobile version reading website: