Chapter 492： Rise of Hugo

ads_wz_txt;

492 Rise of Hugo

As the film critic of "Los Angeles Times" Nicholas said, Hugo's "Mon"-Goss caused a sensation.

Many Jews strongly condemned Steven Spielberg because they believed that the movie glorified A'mon Goss. In real history, A'mon was a cold-blooded murderous demon. Not worthy of mercy at all. This is disrespect for those who have passed away, and even disrespect for Oscar Schindler.

These condemnations also proved the success of Hugo’s performance from the side. On the one hand, his role as A'Meng was really terrifying and scary. Many concentration camp survivors were even scared when they saw Hugo on the big screen. It was so shivering that they couldn’t walk at all; and after the premiere, many Jews came forward to express their admiration for Hugo, but they were reluctant to shake hands or hug Hugo because they were too far. Fear, afraid that the young man with a warm smile in front of him will turn into a man-eater in the next moment.

On the other hand, it showed an unparalleled charm of evil, as Nicholas said, everyone knows that A'mon is evil and terrible, and the crimes of the Nazis are even more untold, but they are on "Schindler's List". On the screen of the movie, A'Meng' played by Hugo is so complicated and fragile, but also so humble and profound, even if A'Meng's a terrible beer belly, even if A'Meng' takes pleasure in killing people, Even if A'mon uses violence to express his love for Helen, this cannot prevent people from being shocked by the charm of A'mon-Goss.

Hugo's interpretation of A'mon'-Goss is so delicate and true, yet full of charm, just like Stockholm Syndrome. He knows that the other party is a bad guy, or a heinous super bad guy, but still can't refuse the inner right. His desire.

Especially played by a sunny young man like Hugo, the impact of the contrast is even more obvious. After the premiere, many people did not recognize that the terrifying executioner on the big screen was the loyal and lovely Charlie in "Smell the Fragrance and the'Female'" or the righteous Daniel in "Yihai Xiongfeng". Or the gentle and reliable Sam in "Sleepless in Seattle", this... simply unimaginable.

Not only the "Los Angeles Times", the "Hollywood Report" also thinks so.

"Hugo Lancaster's performance in'Schindler's List' is definitely the biggest highlight of the whole movie. He has a dark, bloody, brutal, struggling, and painful heart for A'mon-Goss. The grasp of emotions, such as inferiority, inferiority and other emotions, was clearly and delicately conveyed through those eyes, illuminating the entire big screen.

For the most memorable scenes in the movie, A’Meng never had any lines. He just looked at the other side quietly, with a thousand words in his eyes, which echoed in my heart for a long time. For example, A'Meng's alienated and indifferent eyes when he first appeared in a convertible to inspect the concentration camp, such as A'Meng's loyal look when he asked Steyn when he turned Steyn into his own accountant, such as A'Meng 'Listening to Schindler's deep and playful eyes on the theory of'Emperor Power'... Those eyes are like coordinates, revealing all the changes in A'mon's heart vividly and vividly.

Undoubtedly, this is Lancaster's most subversive performance so far, and it is also the most successful, most beautiful and extraordinary performance! "

As the most influential professional magazine in the industry, the praise of the "Hollywood Report" is undoubtedly the greatest affirmation of Hugo's performance. In addition, the "Movie Review" also specially wrote reviews about Hugo. This magazine, published by the Film Association of Lincoln Center in New York, has a huge influence on the East Coast and can be said to be a leader among professional film magazines.

"Hugo’s performance has a soul-absorbing charm. His innocent and clean eyes give too much connotation to the horns. When he is in anger, he exudes a sense of oppression like ghosts and gods. But it also brings unparalleled fear. In Hugo’s performance, we can see that he has control over “sexy”, one point is too full and one point is not enough control. This kind of control is accompanied by the advancement of time. The accumulation of works is transforming Hugo's performance little by little.

In fact, the role of A ‘Mon’-Goss’ ‘color’ gives Hugo very limited space, because he is an evil devil, so simple. A'mon didn’t have Schindler’s inner “aggressive” transformation, nor did Steyn’s hardships in an oppressed situation, nor did Helen’s panic like walking a tightrope. He was a simple Nazi officer, resolutely executing. The Nazi slaughter mission of the Jews. But Hugo gave this character a ‘color’ soul, and showed the charm of the devil vividly within the limited space of the script.

No one will forget Lucifer's beautiful face, and no one will forget Satan's ‘temptation’. The voice of ‘confusion’, no one will forget the devil’s irresistible ‘transaction’...the horror and evil of the devil, but it often represents a fatal attraction. In this regard, Hugo used his performance to push A'mon Goss to a peak.

History will remember Schindler, history will also remember the disasters of the Jews and the crimes of the Nazis; and the "Schindler's List" will remember Hugo Lancaster's amazing'beautiful' eyes eye. "

In fact, after the premiere of "Schindler's List", the movie was the focus of discussion. Almost all topics discussed were around the movie itself. Among these topics, the discussion of Hugo's performance was actually Not many. Except for the “Los Angeles Times”, “Hollywood Report” and “Film Critic”, none of the other media that commented on Hugo’s performance had much discussion. After all, this movie was the focus, and This movie also deserves the weight of focus.

But "Variety" magazine's sentence at the end of its film review represents everyone's opinion of Hugo in the first batch of reviews: "I simply forgot that the murderous madman is Hugo Lancaster!"

This simplest but also the most true and direct comment clearly expresses all the media’s recognition and approval of Hugo’s performance. This also made Hugo once again surprised the entire movie market this year after last year. After the Raspberry Award, Hugo's performance in dedicating four outstanding works and performing four times of'color' performances is enough to make Hugo truly among the top ranks, not to mention that Steven Spielberg is also full of praise for Hugo. !

Steven said in an interview with the Los Angeles Times, "Oh, no, Hugo is certainly not my first choice. God, unless I am crazy, how could I choose Hugo to play the role?" It’s too bold to cast the'color of this role'. But because of an unexpected opportunity, Hugo and I had an occasion to meet, and then Hugo convinced me. To be more precise, Hugo let I fell immediately."

This is the first time Steven expressed his views on Hugo, and it was also spread through an interview with the Los Angeles Times. Nicholas was obviously very curious about Hugo’s audition performance, so he asked this question on behalf of countless audiences. "Did Hugo do anything incredible? Or did he perform some horrifying performance?"

"If it's amazing, it's no match for the crimes A'mon committed against the Jews, so Hugo is impossible to surpass. He has no intention of getting **** in front of me." Steven In the interview. At the backstage of the National Theater, I can feel that his mood is a bit heavy, but it is more of a kind of relaxation, so the language is relatively relaxed, "In fact, Hugo only gave me a look during the audition. If you want to know what it is With such a look, I suggest you go to the movies."

This is Steven's answer, which has caused Hugo's performance to arouse countless heated discussions in an instant, and it also attracted reporters to focus on this aspect when they contained Hugo. At the end of the interview, Steven also expressed his appreciation of Hugo to Nicholas.

"During the entire filming process, Hugo is undoubtedly the hardest person on the crew, even harder than me, because he is a very kind person, but he wants to play a murderous demon, he must The goodness in the heart is hidden, and then a terrifying role is shown that makes people shudder. The hard work that Hugo has made is unimaginable. As a director, I admire actors like Hugo, and I like it better. For actors like Hugo, if there is a chance to cooperate next time, I will not hesitate to send out an invitation."

With such overwhelming praise, Hugo will continue the attention brought by the summer vacation "Night Sleep in Seattle" It also marks that Hugo has completed a real transformation, if gold happens again now In the case of the ball prize event, Hugo must be facing a completely different situation, because now Hugo has proved himself with hard power, not to mention his coveted box office appeal. After two years and the accumulation of four works, Hugo finally took this important step. From the second line to the first line, the life-long career barrier of many actors was broken by Hugo!

After the premiere of "Schindler's List", the first thirteen film critics were overwhelmed with praise and praise. It can be called a comprehensive praise without blind spots. All thirteen media outlets are all in the same category. 'Di gave his own praise, the lowest score is only a ninety point, and the full score is as many as nine!

The first batch of comments sent "Schindler's List" to the pinnacle of public opinion in an instant. Almost all film critics emphasized the fact that this is the best Steven Spielberg has ever seen. 'A movie! This also makes everyone full of expectations for this movie. It is conceivable that countless audiences will swarm into the cinema during the premiere weekend, hoping to watch this movie in person, whether it is good or bad, always needs the audience's personal judgment. .

The praise of the first batch of comments on "Schindler's List" and the strong rise of Hugo are not good news for Tracy Jacobs and Brad Pitt, and it can even be said to be bad news. !