Chapter 841

It is humanistic, right? But the problem will follow, because people are strange and weird. If you say that you can think about it, 2:00 will do. Although the sword of God can also be used, it is a small number after all, right? It is easier to unify. Athena said that this is the chair. This is not the case. Athena is the scale of all things. It is very easy. I just follow along. The goddess of wisdom will do, right? But if everyone here is the measure of the existence of every thing and doesn’t exist, is the world in chaos? The first problem we cannot solve is the concept of things. What do you want a table to call a chair? What is a camera? What is Essence Academy? What is the college entrance examination to go to his college entrance examination? My scale, I think the college entrance examination doesn’t exist. You will find out if the feeling we have talked about before Wang Yangming comes out, right? I think you exist only when you exist, and I am the measure of everything, right? That flower blooms in the wild. Never heard of this country in India. You can, but with such a subjective thing, although he emphasizes that the human-centered emphasis is a great progress, you will find out what his problem is, it is an individual, and it is not you. But what rationality and what do I emphasize? What does it feel like? Everyone talks about my own feelings. What is different from what you reasoned out? What I feel is more selfish and subjective, and what I must reason about, I will find that the wise school emphasizes that people are the yardstick of all things, and it easily leads to the loss of objective standards, right? After we lose the objective standard, we are basically talking to ourselves, and there is no argument in that case. If you don’t understand, there are 65 languages ​​out of 6.5 billion people in the world. There is no objective standard. Lost, right? Okay. But he emphasized that since everyone is the yardstick of everything, all theories have their own opposites. I think this is what you think. Looking at the problem from different angles, it admits that you can look at the problem from different angles. Certain time and space conditions are the basis for the existence of truth. You do not have certain correct standards. Everything has two opposite aspects, even There are many ways to extend it. What is this kind of like, or who do you compare with Huaxia, has anyone said? Has anyone at home in the home ever said that the sound and the sound are in harmony with each other, and the simple dialectics feels a little bit like this. Of course it’s not the same thing, but if he emphasizes that things have two sides or multiple sides, and they Will continue to switch, which is a bit. A little taste has already been seen in philosophy. The characteristics of the Wise School, I have written here with obvious skepticism. The Wise School later developed a school, that is, the suspicion school was in the late stage of the development of philosophy, thought and culture in ancient Greece. When the Chinese Warring States Period was a little later, he formed a school, so it is for this period. This inheritance is very because everyone can explain it by themselves. If I emphasize that I am a standard, there is no standard, right? Then I can doubt everything about you, but I can doubt you. Then you are not entirely a logical thinking, he uses logic to see it. Their kind is Achilles and Achilles, or something that runs very fast one by one, but he can’t run. This kind of logical trap is inside, so don’t worry. I also suspect that by doubting everything, criticizing everything, and overthrowing everything, there will be too much for the world, positive or negative, too many negative things, right? He does not have an objective standard. When my people chatted with me, they mentioned that this history is not a science at all. I haven’t been back anyway, and you can’t know what happened in the past, right or wrong, history, all you have written down are some people’s explanations. History must be some people’s explanation, right? We also need someone to explain the results of the archaeological discoveries excavated in it. He wouldn’t open his mouth to tell me what it means? Guess right? So history is the science explained by the first gate, which is good, but does the science of explanation have no objective standards or not? It must be logical and rational. I personally study history. I am opposed to treating history as People can doubt history to overthrow history and restore history. You can doubt everything, whether it is the present or everything in the past, and you should doubt it, but if you cannot reach the perspective of skepticism, skepticism has been denied. Negative. This is a very dangerous way of looking at it. Famous Chinese scholars mentioned in the history of world philosophy that, first of all, wise men are concerned about philosophy. Leaving from nature and paying more attention to people, first explain this sentence. What does it reflect? What kind of materials are I asking you to make now, understand? If I take this passage as material for you, ..