~： Testimonials, can be skipped

I saw some people dissatisfied with my rebirth essay, and felt that the heroine was too weak, and I felt very angry when I read this article; I also saw some dissatisfied with my male duo, and felt that I shouldn’t write it like that; some people complained about it. The rebirth essay of "Change the soup without changing the medicine", just because my article has a vicious "sister" like many rebirth articles, I gave her a low score and said that my article made her angry, so I gave it to I score.

Book friends who have these ideas think that other people's rebirth essays are not like this, and criticized this essay "Is this also worthy of being called rebirth essay?"

After seeing such comments several times, I will reply to them in a unified manner.

1. This article is about rebirth. The heroine has a gentle personality, heavy feelings, revenge, but disdain to waste a new life in hatred and scum. This is her personality. If you ask me to change the character to "Queen of Revenge", then this role will collapse.

2. The rebirth article I think is not \'Rebirth=invincible'. Rebirth only has an "foresight" ability than others, but it does not control all the elements of change, so it is impossible to be very powerful once reborn. This article sets the heroine Grow in the thorns and gradually become stronger instead of killing all the villains as soon as you rebirth.

3. On the issue of strong villains in this article. I believe that if the villain is not strong, he will not be able to play the protagonist to death in his previous life. Assuming that the villain is mentally retarded, it proves that the heroine is even more retarded (Is it not mentally retarded to be played with the whole life by a mentally retarded person?)

4. This article is a warm and sweet love style, no cheats, no cheats, no cheats, book friends who dislike not can move to other happy books.

5. Give you a pen if you dislike someone who has a vicious sister. You can make innovations. Remember to tell me the name of the literary. I will definitely join in.

6. Regarding the question of "should not write like this" for the second male. The second man set in this article is a set of domineering president with a flower heart. Although he is a flower heart, he must be good enough. Otherwise, why does the heroine fall in love with him in the previous life? Why is he in charge of the entire group?

I love every character in the text because they have a meaning. They may not be the protagonist, but this does not prevent them from being excellent.

7. No one is perfect. Every character with flesh and blood has shortcomings and advantages. I may not be able to write well, but my habit of creating roles is to write down the advantages and disadvantages, and only want to look at the advantages and disadvantages. Readers, I'm sorry, I can't meet your needs.

8. People who are dissatisfied with the article should be merciful, don't have to scold so badly, and accumulate some virtue for themselves. I read some comments and made me feel as if I bullied you, so speechless.

(The above reply is for some readers who have questions, other readers can ignore it.)

PS: This chapter is free of charge for less than one thousand words.