Chapter 1141： The sense of division that exists too deep in the theme

hang up the phone.

Lehmann asked about the later progress of "Spartan 300 Warriors 2" again.

This film, which has maintained the usual oil painting and slow-motion processing of the previous film, has already been processed. According to the producer who is responsible for the control of the film, Wesselin Karachov, who is invited by Director Zha, said that because The reason for the slightly tighter plot creation is that the drama is not as strong as the first one, but the war scene is more grand, and the naval battle is more shocking than the intuitive feeling of the land battle.

Of course, Lehman has become accustomed to the fact that the director can't tell stories. No, it's not that he can't tell stories, but his ability to control the plot is weak. Only by giving him a good book can he play well, but he can't make one. Simple storytelling is more impactful.

To put it simply, Director Zha is essentially a technical director, and his creative ability cannot keep up with his understanding of camera language and aesthetics.

But it doesn't matter. Zha Dao's pragmatic psychology of commercialization and the polished crew experience are very good for the company's needs, and the script of "300 Warriors 2" for the "Xerxes" chapter itself is not good enough, no wonder the crew's brain is not good enough .

night.

Lyman returned home and snuggled with Eva for a while, his body relaxed, but there was still a state of fluctuation in the ocean of his mind, and his thoughts drifted far away.

For a while, he thinks about the Monster Universe, and for a while he thinks of the Conjuring Universe that needs to be mentioned by Wen Ziren, and for a while he struggles with Universal's intentions.

It's not that I don't want the Hulk to be good, and it's not that I don't know how to shoot the sequel. After all, Marvel never accepted the Hulk in the previous life. It is the result of a combination of various factors. For example, Marvel was acquired by Disney. Although Kevin is a The planner of the entire MCU universe, but he also has to respect the opinions of the parent company, otherwise the style of painting will not soften all the way, but the Hulk is destined to be less "just" because of the Hulk's will, just like Nuo Lan's version of Batman's crime-fighting is defined as walking outside the boundaries of the law. Once the Hulk gets out of control, it must be the hidden danger of the team and social trouble, as well as the key target of public and media criticism.

Remember how the Joker took off and pushed Batman off the altar? Hart's depravity is one of them, but what cannot be ignored is the Joker's attraction to people's hearts. If I don't show up, hide my head and show my tail, I will kill an innocent person." Batman suffered the greatest pressure from public opinion, and the contradiction was drawn from terrorism to such a messenger of justice who is not regulated by law.

The same is true of the Hulk. Disney's approach is to reduce its hidden dangers, embed it into the team as a comedy character, and artificially ignore the kind of dramatic conflict on it, so there is no need to start a special drama to dig deeper.

In addition, the original time and space, Edward Norton and Marvel fell out, and experienced a series of things such as losses, re-casting, etc. Considering the actual interests, Disney did not pay much attention to Universal...

The most important thing is that Disney cares about its image, and the protagonists in the toy industry or IP industry always rely on justice rather than controversy to export culture. Why can Nolan's Batman trilogy achieve such reputation and success, especially The second "Dark Knight" chapter, that's because Nolan has shaped the contradictions too delicately, and it may be difficult for him to surpass the sophistication in his life.

Disney is very smart. It knows that it takes a moment of talent between a pass-line work and a high-quality work. It doesn't want to grab creative inspiration that is not necessarily obtained by subjective consideration, but is steady and step-by-step. The output value of the assembly line is enough, because once the disputed contradictions are not played well, it will ruin the great future of Marvel. Is Disney afraid to shoot for fear of losing money? A big loss is a matter of one or two hundred million, and it has a lot of money. Will Disney care about this?

It, it is afraid that "The Incredible Hulk 2" will continue to fail, and even the concept of "Reunion" is not easy to talk about. The investment of one or two hundred million is a trivial matter, and the long-term capital flow with a higher upper limit cannot be Problems are big things.

Lying on the bed, his thoughts turned, and Lyman remembered the theme chapter of the civil war again.

In the past life, Marvel was the foreshadowing of Tony Stark's psychological problems. In layman's terms, it is difficult for soldiers to return to normal life after the war, insomnia, dreams, fickleness, night sweats, anxiety, panic PTSD trauma syndrome , In short, after the New York War, Mr. Tony was trapped in the pressure from both physical and psychological aspects, and there was a vague idea that the earth would not become a battlefield for other alien races, and the prototype of the umbrella plan was created. After Genesis and Ultron, in view of the destructive limitations of superheroes, I wanted to make an annotation on a transparent behavioral logic.

The forward-looking of this narrative and the foreshadowing of the content Kevin has ideas to check, of course, Lehman also gave some suggestions, such as the third Iron Man is the end of a single-line role, rather than a closed loop of Iron Man , clarified a flaw.

Fans who have followed the MCU from beginning to end know that "Iron Man 3" will give people a more and more disconnected feeling as the framework develops later, because when the Marvel team is considering this, they plan to have a good start and a good end, and give Tony a very deep feeling. , special, and the perfect end to a very closed loop.

But the problem is that after "Iron Man 3", Robert Downey Jr. will appear in other Marvel universe works, and he did not completely quit, which caused "Iron Man 3" to build on the character design, so Make deep.

Like at the end, he blew up all the steel armors as Christmas fireworks. The implication is nothing more than: when the positive side has powerful force, it will also breed the threat of the villain to the world. The producer refers to the lethal nuclear weapons in the real society. Threats, that is, the more powerful a country's weapons are, the more it will cause other countries to have to join the arms race, thus entering a spiral.

The artistic conception of "removing his armour and returning to the field" for Tony is a very advanced treatment.

It's just that such a metaphor in the Marvel Universe will seem a bit ridiculous, because in the next works, Tony's steel armor has to be upgraded all the time.

This makes many fans when they revisit this movie, the most judgments are chaos.

Marvel has made the final version of Iron Man. After thinking about the script several times, it took a lot of effort to establish a long-term narrative. Of course, it took a lot of effort, but as a superhero who opened the door to the Marvel universe, based on the market and popularity, it is impossible to have 3 movies. Just give up, this contradiction is very thoroughly exposed in "Iron Man 3".

In this regard, Lehman's suggestion is not to think too much, to dig for a sense of luxury.

Kevin is afraid that there will be no story behind this one-line series. This Lehman understands. After all, "Iron Man 2" has proved that the routine creation of portraying a villain and winning the villain is a filter damage to the word-of-mouth character. And with more damage, how much will the audience love the character?

But on the other hand, the Marvel team's handling of the problem was not smooth enough, and they wanted to elevate Iron Man's idea too much. The physical confrontation reflected from the element poisoning in the second part and the psychological confrontation based on the New York War in the third part made it too deliberate. .

Why do audiences like Iron Man?

In addition to the empathetic interpretation between actors and characters, shouldn't the audience like the concept of superheroes precisely because they have the spirit of defending the world and the ability to actually do such a thing .

This ability is beyond ordinary people. If it is an ordinary person, the audience is an ordinary person, and no one believes that it can be done.

To put it mildly, is the audience like Mr. Tony who likes to take off his armor? No, what everyone likes is that he became a hero by putting on a battle armor with his genius R&D ability.

In other words, the theme of the third part is wrong, you shouldn't be entangled in battle armor or not, PTSD is right, worrying about the future is also something Tony can do, but forcing Tony and steel armor to be opposites, on the contrary In disguised denial Tony himself.

Besides, Tony doesn't need too tragic color injection.

He is a wanderer, he is a scientific research genius, and he is also a man with a sense of responsibility. There is no such thing as taking off the iron armor. Tony is still a superhero. He is Iron Man, and Iron Man is Tony, no need to deliberately differentiate.

Originally, after explaining the creative direction to Kevin, the plan was arranged like this. After the battle with the lame man, Tony wore the armor to continue the climax of the press conference in the first part, reaffirmed that he was Iron Man, and cleared the psychological obstacles, and then slowly led to the subsequent events of the Civil War.

But if the Hulk wants to join, is it possible to add a new fuse in the process...for example...Lyman thought about it and fell asleep...

​​

Please remember this book's first domain name: . Mobile version reading website: