After leaving the event site, inside the black Lincoln commercial vehicle.

A group of people running the road show day and night is exhausting both physically and mentally. At this time, there were no outsiders, and he was paralyzed in his seat without taking care of his image.

However, the just-announced sequel plan still makes everyone have their own thoughts.

The sequel to the hit movie, anyone with a little brains knows how good it is.

Zha Dao stole a glance at Laiman and saw that his eyes were closed, he didn't know whether to disturb him or not.

There was some silence in the car, and at the moment Lehmann was also thinking about developing a sequel.

This is not a whim, but a resource utilization that cannot be wasted because the film's performance is too good.

After all, he agreed to conceive the plot with a blank ending.

You can't always lay a foreshadowing instead of using it.

At this moment, he suddenly thought of "Zombie World War".

If you count the time line, it happens to be the background of the story that the entire United States fell after the outbreak of the zombie tide...

In terms of box office, more than 500 million in the world is not too bad.

However, the main problem of this film is that it pays too much attention to the special effects of the camera lens, and the arrangement of the literary drama is a little too childish.

The spectacular visual experience can't support the brain-damaged plot at all, just like a person's stomach has many internal organs, but only the heart is missing. It also seems to have chosen "quantity", gave up "quality", chose "stimulation" and gave up "plot depth", chose "big scene", and gave up "character building", and did not shoot the soul of a doomsday disaster movie.

And if you choose this one, the plot is a big problem.

It is very likely that a major change is needed. To undertake the creative context of "New York Row", let the two have a good linkage as much as possible. Otherwise, it will not be easy for fans to accept it with satisfaction.

He thought about it carefully, and seemed to have some ideas for a while...

The IMDB score of "New York Tour" fell to 8.2 points, which is enough to rank in the top 100 among the high-scoring movies included in the website.

In the forefront of it are "Scarface", "The Maltese Eagle" and other excellent works, "New York Row" happens to be tied with "Las Vegas" and "The Deer Hunter" at 8.2 points, ranking 93rd.

However, literary and artistic films always have slightly higher ratings. If you add the box office profit margin, it is normal for "Row to New York" to be in the top 20.

After all, zombie-themed works have a very low ceiling. A 7.3 or 7.4 is very good.

The score of "New York Row" has become a new ceiling for the Hollywood zombie theme.

This is also because the production team of the film is a pan-English circle. If Asia is filmed, the acceptance of the American audience will be reduced.

In terms of cultural acceptance, Americans have never been too tolerant.

In the IMDB commentary, a view that many people agreed with was that in some parts of "New York Tour", it still paid too much attention to the commercial atmosphere, and did not dig deep into the inferiority of the theme.

For example, why did the director not let the soldiers shoot pregnant women and children at the end?

If this is the end, it will be dark, and it will further insinuate the incompetence of the US government. This seems to be deeper and more desperate, and it will go up at once.

Such views suddenly spread on the Internet. It seems that someone is pushing the envelope.

After all, "New York Row" has occupied too much market, and it should be hated by others. Are you blocking someone's way of making money? There are many similar topics, and everyone suddenly started playing to find fault.

Ryman soon found out about it.

For such a question, he was somewhat amused.

"New York Trip" is still dominated by box office.

The protagonist who died was scolded by many fans, and another group was destroyed, or it was a child and a pregnant woman who symbolized hope. Isn't it a plot to feed shit?

In this world, most people still want to see a happy ending. Because everyone knows that the movie is fake, but a good movie can't help but let the audience into the emotions.

All the characters, whether they die or not, are all a matter of how the director and the screenwriter arrange them. If they have to be too forceful, wouldn't it be difficult for the audience and the box office market?

Soon, a powerful press release began to refute the argument. Written by Lyman.

"Some young literary and artistic young people like to highlight the "dark side of human nature" at every turn.

Why do you want to highlight the "dark side of human nature"? Is there anything you want to do on purpose? Wouldn't it be okay to not highlight the movie? Is it too high?

Then in "Titanic", everyone escaped for their lives, and the male protagonist kicked the female protagonist into the water, which was quite "dark"; in "The Godfather", the gang members were all cold and fierce, killing innocent people indiscriminately, not obeying the rules, Isn't it also more "dark"?

But why do that?

Is the central idea of ​​"New York Row" only the darkness of human nature left? If it is, maybe you haven't seen it, or Xia Ji is looking at it.

The transformation of the male protagonist Jack, from being selfish and selfish, just wanting to escape with his daughter alone, to being influenced by the kindness of some survivors, joining others to break up, saving people, and dying, crying unwillingly, is also to practice. Do your own responsibility.

Not to mention the strong man, who protects his wife all the way, proves that he is a real man, and always stands up.

There is also the baseball boy and the cheerleader. The two have mutual affection, and they have not yet shown it, nor do they know that God will block a door that cannot be opened between the two at any time, and finally die together with the cheerleader in their arms.

As for the soldier who didn't shoot in the end, it strongly proves that everything you want to protect is worth protecting, and it is the hope of the isolated island.

At this time, for the sake of being profound and profound, are you sick?

There are so many ugly faces in the movie, and survival has become so difficult, but at critical moments, someone will still stand up.

This is also what the movie wants to talk about. What's wrong with the ending?

Those soldiers no longer long for survivors in their hearts? The destruction of the road, the devastation, and the wreckage of the zombies all show that the soldiers are holding a meaningful position Also, those who are always thinking about the dark side may be mentally ill.

If you are ill, don't delay treatment, take care and live longer. advice. "

……

"Travel to New York" is not without flaws, there are even one or two crossover shots, and the setting is not well set up.

Criticism is not unheard of. For example, Dwayne Johnson's acting skills are not natural enough, and the action scenes are not bad. When it comes to literary dramas, it is too superficial, angry for anger, and there is no close-up close-up, just for fear of revealing that Johnson's acting skills are not solid. a little.

There is also Eva, who has no sense of existence. Although there is no problem with the performance, it is not good enough. If it is not for a long shot of her, that is, after Jack died, Eva protected Angie and cried while holding her voice. Great job, and then, it's gone. Presence is still weak.

Because Anji is a child, it is enough to match his image, which is more praise than criticism.

For the rest of the characters, the villain in the suit is the most amazing. It completely overwhelms the actors such as Eva and Johnson, and also weakens the camera effect of the protagonist group, which is somewhat unbalanced.

These are all points that Ryman agrees with.

He didn't want to refute either.

――――

​​

https://

Genius remembers the address of this site in one second: . Mobile version reading website: