C3073 A little disagreement

"No, no, the Marshal was wrong. The problem in Paris has to be solved no matter what, because the conditions for Trochu to compensate us are too low. It doesn't match our expectations at all!"

"But this matter is not the same as destroying the Paris Commune. If we destroy the commune, then we won't get anything!"

"Please remember, the Commune is not only Prussia's enemy, they are also the enemies of the France Republic. Those nobles and capitalists wanted to exterminate them as soon as possible!"

"Why do you want our men to die? Those people are obviously the enemies of the noble capitalists in the France.

"Are you saying that we should sit on the sidelines and watch the battle?" Steinmetz nodded. "Indeed, a civil war is a good way to weaken France!"

"But what can we gain from the destruction of the left by the republicans? Will they give us more money to pay for it when the time comes? "

"And I doubt that, with an enemy like us in Prussia, the French left and right will have a full-fledged civil war?"

"Of course, there has been a conflict in Paris City these past two days. But, forgive me for speaking bluntly, but according to the understanding of the military, this level of fighting can only be considered as rioting and not a civil war!"

"These are your two questions!" Xiao Letian stretched out two fingers. "The first question is, you don't believe that a large-scale civil war will break out in France, and the second one is that the French themselves will end the civil war, so we won't get anything, right?"

"That's right, I have these two worries!"

"Dear leader, you have to know that the France is the first nationalist country in Europe. The people here have already been completely transformed by nationalist ideas!"

"In the current era of foreign enemies, will there be a civil war between them and their people? Do not forget that the cohesion of nationalist countries is indeed terrible! "

This was the limitation of his eyes on history. The biggest difference between Xiao Letian and Steinmetts was that they had completely different memories. He had more than a hundred years of history and knew how humans killed each other in the next hundred years.

As for Steinmetz and others like him, they were of the current generation. They could only analyze, judge and interpret the current situation from the perspective of past history.

There was less than a hundred years of data in the basic database for analyzing problems. Of course, the results of that analysis would be far too different.

At the end of the nineteenth century, the whole world was mainly in Europe, so their attitude towards France was very subtle. On one hand, the other countries were monarchs, and they were very resistant to the place where the revolution was taking place, so they were very wary of the Bonaparte Family's empire.

On the other hand, fear came directly from the rule of the French Revolution and the War God.

Nationalism was a completely new thing to kings and emperors, a very strange and frightening thing. Nationalism had a strong internal inclusiveness, but it also had a strong xenophobia.

This was not conducive to the multiethnic rule of kings and emperors, and nationalism was bound to accompany the opening of the wisdom of the people. Once the wisdom of the people was opened, the control over the people by feudalism and religious theocracy would also become weaker and weaker.

In other words, once nationalism was widely spread, the's privileges would be reduced, and there would even be the worry of some large empires falling apart.

It was because of this line of thinking that after the French Revolution, all the monarchs of Europe had joined forces to strangle this foreign country. This was the reason why the anti-French alliance was formed multiple times in a row.

War was the best teacher. The bloodshed and killing on the battlefield left all the European kings dumbfounded. They finally understood how terrifying the battle prowess of a country supported by the National Nationalism Aura was!

Napoleon the War God was indeed a hero, he was an expert in the art of command. However, his successive victories were not only because of his personal achievements.

That country which had undergone the baptism of the great revolution, where the people believed in nationalism, was the source of terror!

Imagine, back then, that Europe was still full of recruitment, and that the king had to give enough money to the peasants before they could take up arms and go to war.

The countless tax conflicts between the King and the Capitalist Council were, after all, due to the need for military support for the king's war.

In those days, Britain, Prussia, the Austria … In the other countries, the military was made up of two groups of people. One group was made up of nobles, and the other group was made up of peasants.

In essence, the peasant soldiers had the same attitude as the food soldiers in China.

But at that time, the France army under Napoleon's command was not like that, it was an army that accepted nationalism and had a sense of national pride.

They could get military pay, but they would have to fight without a military pay!

Once the Marseille started singing, once the slogan of patriotism started to spread, the hot-blooded youth would walk onto the battlefield without any complaints, and follow the flag of the God of War to fight you to death.

On the one hand, they were peasants who didn't have any faith in their own hearts and wanted to roam the world for money!

On one side is the nationalist soldier who shouted "Long live France, even if you haven't eaten your fill yet, you still want to fight with your life on the line"!

How could one fight such a battle? This was actually the place where the France army terrorized European countries!

Back then, the Napoleon the War God actually possessed an endless supply of troops. Even if there was a problem with his empire finances, if he wrote promissory notes to the soldiers of the entire country, those soldiers would still work hard with him.

He was really putting his life on the line and not a deceiving soldier of slogans!

The sixth Anti-France Alliance, Napoleon suffered from the betrayal of many little States s. In the end, it caused his defence to be empty, and allowed the Alliance Army to find a flaw and take down Paris.

The entire council, as well as the majority of the aristocratic groups, including Napoleon's own family and relatives had all fallen into enemy hands, which was why the arrogant French Emperor had surrendered.

At that time, he was completely the embodiment of French Nation's doctrine, which meant that he himself represented the national spirit of the France.

When he stepped onto the France's land, the army and officials from the various provinces were all looking down from the sky. The whole restoration process was as easy as a trip.

This was immediately followed by the last anti-French alliance. Although Napoleon failed in the battle of Waterloo, his army officers were still unwilling to surrender.

They requested for the emperor to give them the order to fight. As long as the French Emperor raised his flag and gave the order for a general resistance, millions of young people in the entire France would still be joining the battle.

These Europeans had personally tasted the terror of a nationalist nation. Their fear of Napoleon and the fear of the revolution were completely rooted deep in their souls.

Napoleon failed twice, and in the end, he was only exiled twice. Who would dare to kill his head? Does Britain dare?

At that time, all the kings of Europe knew that if anyone dared to execute Napoleon, the nationalist hornet's nest in France would completely explode.

War will never end until one side dies!

It was the experience of history, cruel and bloody, and people like Steinmetz had studied it deeply, and they knew everything that had happened in that era.

Would such a nationalist country really have a civil war at a time of great enemy?

What about the internal cohesion of nationalism? Could it all have disappeared?

"The Führer! Is the civil war you speak of really on such a small scale? "How many people die a day from this kind of rebellion?"