The live room's bullet screen has been painted by the overwhelming 666, and the audience are all confused.

It can be said that the vast majority of people present did not expect that Chen Mo would come up with this set of words.

Professor Xu's expression was very excited. Obviously, he wanted to pat the table and say it was "nonsense", but his hands were all raised, but he couldn't do it.

The other two guests also looked at each other, apparently their brains were running fast to refute the saying, but they were short of words for a while.

Is Chen Mo wrong?

There's a big problem!

At least the first reaction of the guests on the opposite side when they heard Chen Mo's words was, isn't it nonsense?

But I straightened out the logic from the beginning to the end. It seems to be quite complete

Chen Mo's examples, including Mike's satirical remarks about capitalism, words on the police car, FIB related plots, etc., are all in the GTA. Chen Mo can't openly spread rumors in front of the public. Since there are these elements, Chen Mo said that GTA is exposing the ugliness of capitalism, which seems to be very logical.

Moreover, it's hard to stand on the ground of GTA's violence.

When a carrier takes "exposure" and "criticism" as the main goal to show the plot, too much beautification of the scene will make such criticism greatly compromised. In short, like some essays about beheading in the old society, the ignorant people tried to cure the disease by dipping the blood of revolutionaries into the blood of human beings. In fact, this plot is quite bloody, even more bloody than most movies and TV dramas.

However, if we want to eliminate this bloody and violent influence and over beautify this plot, the "critical" effect it wants to achieve will not exist.

If we force all similar subjects to be like fairy tales, it will only make people feel extremely false and eventually become a complete cultural garbage.

These people's doubts about GTA mainly focus on its "violence" appearance, while Chen Mo raised the topic to a higher level of "spiritual connotation", so it directly raised the topic and formed a "dimension reduction attack".

The key to this is that GTA must have enough connotation.

GTA does.

Is it a game that encourages crime? Not at all.

Most people feel that GTA encourages people to commit crimes, but it is not.

GTA does not encourage crime, nor does it induce players to kill indiscriminately or brutally. It is not the hot blood in the Jianghu that most people think it is, nor the unrestrained and happy enmity that teenagers yearn for, but the shackles that are becoming more and more tight. It tells of the sorrow of being played with by invisible enemies after defeating visible enemies.

In GTA's world, there has never been a false way to marry Bai Fumei and go to the top of life by crime. Instead, they are constantly betrayed by their friends, or betrayed by their friends. They have to bow to the more powerful black evil forces for the time being and serve as biting dogs for fib's animals.

Those stories that seem to stimulate the hormones of players are actually just constantly wiping the buttocks of others and completing one task after another, but they can never redeem their freedom from fib.

The protagonist in the previous work, perhaps in the next work, will die like a wild dog. No one cares about his life or death.

When entering the GTA world for the first time, many people may indulge in the pleasure of killing and looting, but with the deepening of the plot, players feel the sadness and joy of the protagonist, and will find that in fact, everyone in the story, even those little supporting actors, also have their own sorrow. And the deeper disclosure of the whole social situation derived from this is the key to make GTA different from a cool tour and become a full score masterpiece.

……

Today's current affairs debate is still going on, but the wind on the Internet has completely turned to Chen mo.

Of course, Chen Mo's words can't conquer all people. For Professor Xu and Chen Baiyou, they have preset the position that "violent games will inevitably lead to crime" in their brains, and it's impossible to persuade them with any explanation.

But of course, Chen Mo's words are not for the three opposition guests, but for all the viewers who are concerned about the hot spot in front of the TV and computer.

What Chen Mo wants is public opinion's support for GTA, or at least no objection. What he wants is the tolerance and understanding of the whole social environment for the development of games, especially virtual games.

In the second half of the program, several opposition guests and on-site audience are still trying to refute Chen Mo's statement, but Chen Mo responds one by one, completely occupying the initiative on the scene.

At the end of the program, Hu Yue asked Chen Mo: "thank you very much for Mr. Chen's coming to today's current affairs debate to give an official explanation of GTA's game, and let us better understand the real meaning of the game. Finally, I have another question, which was put forward by a live audience just now. The traditional violent games may have little impact, but as the next generation VR, the immersive and realistic sense of matrix game cabin is far superior to that of traditional PC and mobile games. Will it have a more serious impact? "Instead of answering directly, Chen asked, "what do you think is the future of virtual reality technology?"

Hu Yue is stunned: "the future? I think the future should be closer to the real world. "

Chen Mo nodded: "yes, the so-called virtual reality focuses on" reality ". Whether some people are willing to admit it or not, the ultimate form of virtual reality will be the perfect reproduction of reality, or even beyond reality. What kind of virtual reality will we create in the future? Is it a paradise where everyone lives and works in peace and without any crime? "

"I'm sorry, although it's a good wish, it may only exist in a few unrealistic ideas. From the current literary works, no matter novels, films, TV plays, comics or games, there are almost no such false scenes. If you don't believe it, think about whether there is a popular movie or a best-selling book that "everyone lives in peace and happiness". I think similar scenes only exist in heaven. "

"Why? Because the vast majority of people do not like this kind of false

"When virtual reality develops into the future, it must also be diverse, with truth, goodness and beauty, as well as falsehood, vice and ugliness. Positive and negative are the two sides of the coin. If we remove all the negative things, the positive things will appear false and the whole world will become pale. Negative things are to inspire people's yearning for good things, so that they can better understand what is good. "

"So will the violent elements of next generation VR have a more serious impact? My answer is, No. Not only won't, but this is the only way of virtual reality. The future virtual world is an all inclusive world. As for what is good and what is bad, the most players have the right to judge. "