Chapter 2429

"Independent Telegraph", 60 points, "Colin trevoro, just like most types of live directors, they can find the bottom line of commercial films, but when they try to move to a higher level, they always lose themselves in the balance between stupid and serious control."

"The daily news", 60 points, "it could have been worse, but thank God, Langley hall saved the work; Unfortunately, lanli has not been able to get rid of the panic and fear of dinosaur chase, and the final product of the film can only barely reach the pass line. "

"Vanity Fair", 60 points, "the movie is interesting enough to attract the audience's attention to the end; But after watching the film, we can realize that compared with the connotation and depth of the script, it is far from enough. The problem is not whether dinosaurs are fresh and vivid, but that it is not enough to rely on dinosaurs alone. The only right choice is the appearance of Langley hall. His presence makes the film more possible. I'd like to go to the cinema of the sequel for him - provided that he can still be on the cast at the time of the sequel. "

"Washington Post", 60 points, "it's hard to tell whether Jurassic world wants to become a popcorn style junk food or to go further. If Colin Trevor tries to try more at the level of theme connotation, the problem is that he seems to want to try too much. "

"Chicago Sun", 60 points, "one out of every three Americans would like to go into the cinema to watch the Jurassic world." they can find exactly what they are looking forward to, not much, not much. Unfortunately, the "not much" part is disappointing. It's a lenley hall film, and we're looking forward to seeing more. Besides his performance, there are more valuable things

"Los Angeles Times", 60 points, "Jurassic world" seems to be a hot production, it has all the elements of a movie to detonate the box office market, seriousness and humor, characters and stories, and of course, the stimulation of popcorn style, all things are broken together in a blender; But can these fragments really keep the audience looking forward to it? Langley hall is still the best part of the movie, but that's all

It is not difficult to find that there are not a few media giving the comments, and there are many authoritative figures such as "Los Angeles Times" and "Chicago Sun".

All kinds of views have a little similarity, but the rich and complex core has not been able to further in-depth discussion, which finally makes the film stay at a level of no upper or lower, no more or less, sometimes it means balance; And sometimes it means the middle way - obviously, Jurassic world belongs to the latter.

When lanli got the script at the beginning, he put forward a similar view: the script is too ambitious, many branches are scattered, and there are too many problems to discuss, but all of them are just dragonflies, not in-depth, which makes those thinking stay in a lukewarm state, and may lead to the distraction of the audience.

Later, the script was adjusted according to Langley's idea, and the relationship between Irving and Blair was used as a dark line to connect the relevant thinking about the use of dinosaurs as a weapon of war. The whole story was much more concise; But judging from the finished products, if Colin Trevor is still not willing to give up the foreshadowing of those branch lines, the theme of the film is still a little complicated, which affects the viewing experience.

Naturally, this has become the focus of criticism.

But Andy found it very interesting.

First, when Lan Li took over the script, he put forward relevant opinions and worried about the quality of the finished film; And now the media reaction just confirmed lanli's evaluation, which once again proved lanli's unique interpretation of the script.

Second, it is not difficult to find that the bad reviews mainly focus on the scheduling and control of the whole movie, which is also the most important part of the commercial popcorn movie. If we can't catch the audience's attention, then everything is in vain; The central review focuses on the interpretation and expression of the core, which is the key for commercial films to further become excellent from the passing level. The audience is not only excited, but also looking forward to more experience.

"Titanic" and "Avatar" can create a miracle in film history, which is definitely not so simple, but more accidental and inevitable; However, the box office success of "Avengers alliance" is another type. China Review media obviously expects "Jurassic world" to bring more things.

Can "Jurassic world" bring more?

This problem depends on the opinions of the favorable media - bad reviews determine the lower limit, while favorable reviews determine the upper limit, and the reputation of commercial films depends on it.

"Empire", 95%, "Jurassic world" is a pure, silly, wall crashing joy popcorn comedy. When you come in and take the 3D glasses, you can temporarily deposit your brain in the luggage area, and then take it back when you leave. The entertainment effect is comparable to that of the Avengers alliance three years ago. What's more, the charm of Langley hall is enough to make up for the number advantage of the six member Avengers alliance. "

"Hollywood report", 90 points, "Trevor has done an excellent job, every link is correct, and the admirable rhythm control runs through the whole process; Through the big screen of the film, we can feel Trevor's desire to pay homage to Spielberg's 1993 work, and he succeeded. The most wonderful part is undoubtedly the overall scheduling of the climax. While the audience laments the excitement of the dinosaur duel, they still won't forget the important existence of Langley hall. "

The New York Times, 90 points, "Jurassic world" is a work urgently needed this summer. It's not as esoteric as interstellar crossing or gravity, and it doesn't present any new content; However, when all contradictions and conflicts come together, a rare spark can be produced. The full-scale outbreak of adrenaline can make the audience enjoy the pleasure of blood and violence, and the actors' accurate performance is also a highlight. "

"Variety", 88 points, "undoubtedly, this work inherits many advantages of Spielberg's version of" Jurassic Park ": rich imagination, exciting thrill and a trace of reflection on human beings themselves, and presents a bucket of cream popcorn after processing from a new perspective in the 21st century. Is it perfect? Of course not; Is it worth going to the cinema? A hundred will. "

"New Yorker", 85 points, "no matter how you are going to evaluate 'Jurassic world', this film's wonderful visual effects are enough to maintain the high attention of the audience, so that the audience can escape from real life for a short time and enter their own imagination of the unknown, and make those films that lack fantasy and dream fade. And the best part is that it can awaken our love and enthusiasm for film magic, which is enough to prove many things. "

"Voice of the village", 83 points, "it's a fresh and exciting film. Every detail reminds people of the existence of the original series, but it's definitely not a bad remake or reproduction. If Trevor injects fresh imagination and bold new interpretation into the film, maybe the film is doomed to fail to create a new world as it did 22 years ago, But at least it's a good start for the series to restart. "

The guardian, 83 points, "the perfect choice for summer: fun, refreshing, exciting, thrilling, even a little ridiculous to funny weird, at the same time, there are witty and clever turns. What else can we ask for? In addition, the light of Langley hall still shines

"Chicago Tribune", 80 points, "if you only need one reason to go to the cinema, then Langley hall can meet all your requirements for the film. There is no doubt that this is his most charming work, and even dinosaurs are his foil; If you need more reasons, then dinosaurs should be able to add points. "

"American weekly", 80 points, "after 20 years of dinosaurs dominating the earth cinema, can we still temporarily put down our mobile phones for two hours and put down the irony and aloofness that we feel good about ourselves, and frankly admit that we are still shocked and sighed by the existence of that group of life? Trevoro, who clearly believes in this, is sincere and attentive enough that everyone in the audience is willing to admit that he has a drink. Hall, on the other hand, made this point more convincing. "

Obviously, praise is more objective and tolerant: for commercial films, they don't put forward strict unrealistic requirements, but evaluate them from the perspective of market demand - after all, this is not "star crossing", they can put forward more expectations for Christopher Nolan, But if Colin Trevor and universal pictures were not prepared to dig deep into the core, it would not be necessary at all.

What's more, from "Jurassic Park" to "Jurassic world", the audience has never walked into the cinema because "the film discusses the relationship between human beings and dinosaurs in life and death". It's like the real classic of "great white shark" is not to discuss the importance of protecting the natural environment.

All the reviews have reached a consensus: on the basis of rhythm control and climax foreshadowing, "Jurassic world" has indeed met the requirements, and even has a little surprise. As for details, everyone has their own feelings, which leads to the difference in scores, but does not affect the excellence of the film.

The most interesting part is not about Langley's praise, but a viewpoint from the detailed film review of the New York Times

Langley hall once spent a lot of time with Colin Trevor to discuss the revision of the script. The tedious branch lines were cut down a lot, reducing some ambition, and forcing the script to be more concise and clearer, which undoubtedly made the quality of the finished product to a higher level; In addition, the emotional interaction between lenley and Bryce also foreshadows the story, which is another noteworthy detail.