Chapter 1930

"Star Trek" media review is officially hot.

Bad comments, one.

In the evaluation, ten.

……

Full marks, ten.

Twenty eight.

……

Without looking at the comments for the time being, we can see from the data comparison that "Star Trek" continues the trend of public praise during the internal audition. Under the ambiguous and ambiguous overall pattern, the praise for Nolan and Langley still prevails - no matter how personal impression is, or undeniable, the completion of the work is still worth affirming.

After carefully browsing the content of the reviews, we can gradually find that the main controversy among film critics is whether the "theme of family love" is enough: too dramatic? Too mean? Too bloody and sensational? Or is emotion part of human nature? Is it right to return to humanity itself? Are trigger points for discussion and reflection everywhere?

This is also the boundary between "Zhongping" and "Zhongping".

In fact, 48 of the 49 media have reached a lot of consensus

The visual effects are really magnificent, the space images are really amazing, the sound effects are really wonderful, and the performances of the actors are really good... Generally speaking, Nolan once again showed his keen talent for lens, picture and editing, and successfully completed a well-made work.

The only regret and most interesting point is that Nolan's weakness of not being good at training actors has been exposed again.

At the beginning, heath ledger of "Batman: The Dark Knight" completely relied on the actor's own interpretation. His role as a clown became the first actor in history to win an Oscar performance award with a superhero film, but Nolan's contribution was limited.

The same is true this time.

The whole theme of "Star Trek" is based on emotion, which further highlights the importance of actors' performance. Unfortunately, Nolan does not have the ability to train his acting skills, so he can only rely on the actors' self-development to complete the role, which is also the reason why he relies on powerful CASS.

Blue ritual Holzer, Anne Hathaway, Jessica - Zan, Michael Kaine - this is a very powerful cast, and has won fourteen Oscar nominations and four gold medal trophies. Their strength is beyond doubt. But the oral expression of the performance is slightly different, some people make complaints about it, and some people are crazy about tucking up the slot. The main reason is

There is no way to unify.

Every actor has his own performance style, but Nolan has not been able to find the same rhythm and connect all the performances together, which makes the final picture inevitable imbalance, especially the differences in performance strength and rhythm, which often makes the emotions of the characters rise and fall like a seesaw, unable to form a unity, This also further magnified the emotional drama, leading to the strong criticism of "soap opera".

The result is that someone love to make complaints about others.

However, James Roche of "playlist" is bound to disagree with other critics

"Maybe interstellar crossing isn't perfect, but Langley hall proved himself again."

"It's definitely not Christopher Nolan's best work. It's still a long way from the best; But there is no doubt that this is an exploration of Christopher Nolan's jumping out of his own security field, trying to broaden his understanding and exploration of film, and the only reason why this exploration can succeed is Langley hall

"Hall! Raleigh hall proved once again that he is one of the most outstanding actors of our time! Every look on the big screen vividly interprets the change of emotion. His performance gives the character real vitality. It's hard to imagine what it would be like without Langley Hall's "Star Trek."

"I really don't want to praise Langley Hall any more. Those praise words have become callous and even boring. But the fact is that hall has proved once again that he is irreplaceable among actors under 30. The exquisite and profound performance really explains the vastness of Othello. "

"In this world, if you choose an actor to sit in front of the camera and talk to himself for 90 minutes, the audience must sit in the same place and watch. My first choice will always be Langley hall! Did anyone notice a pause and a turn in the opening phase of Langley hall? That's the story. "

"The favorite part of the film: the eyes of Langley hall. In the most important turns of the whole film, the eyes of Langley hall have become the finishing touch on the whole big screen, simple and profound, but full of strength. To be honest, I can't think of a better word to describe him. "

"In a commercial film, he can go beyond the cover of the director and special effects and give a incisive and profound performance. The last time he appeared in Nolan's work, the actor was called Heath Ledger."

……

James Roche doesn't like his performance, not because his performance is disappointing, but because of the homogeneity of "interstellar crossing" and "gravity". He hopes that he can break through himself; But obviously, James Roche's idea has not been recognized and supported by his peers.

praise! praise! Or praise! One by one, I just can't stop. Even the media that gave the China Review didn't mean their praise. Considering that this is a commercial film, it's even more incredible. So, is this a good thing or a bad thing?

Haters are bound to think that this is another routine of "commercial flattery". Maybe lanli's performance is really good, but how can the focus of commercial film be performance? Can be special effects, can be a story, can be the charm of the protagonist, but... Performance? Are you sure it's not a joke?

Supporters don't care, because Langley has proved his excellence by performing again and again. Before that, Langley's performance was highly praised in "speed and passion 5" and "tomorrow's edge", so why not in "Star Trek"? Maybe the performances of other actors in commercial films can't show their brilliance, but it doesn't mean that lanli can't do it either. What's more, the case of "gravity" was not long ago.

It's a good thing and a bad thing.

However, it is undeniable that the comprehensive review of the media once again shows the determination of the professional film reviewers. Despite the negative comments in the award season, in fact, the positive views of the film critics on "gravity" and "drunken folk songs" have never changed. This is also the strong support point for Langley to win the Oscar nomination for the fourth consecutive year, Film critics also remain relatively objective and praise blue.

After the low point of the award season and the missed Oscars, people are still looking forward to the high-profile "pop drummer" at the Sundance Film Festival, and looking forward to this work becoming a shining moment for Lanley to show the charm of the actors; But who would have thought that "Star Trek" took the lead in accomplishing such a feat in the summer season. It showed the powerful control of lanli's performance with the shell of a commercial film, and won applause again!

The recovery momentum has come so fast!

But seriously, strictly speaking, in fact, lanli never really fell into a trough or predicament, so the "recovery" is out of the question.

The praise and pursuit of "interstellar crossing" is that after a short period of ups and downs, lanli is given the treatment he deserves. This is a more appropriate statement. Compared with the recovery and rise, lanli's current position in the industry has limited space for continuous "breakthrough". It is enough to return to its original position.

From the confusion of poor reviews and medium reviews to the heat wave of good reviews, the media comprehensive review of "Star Trek" came out in the spotlight. The comprehensive review of 49 media finally reached 79 points. Unfortunately, they failed to cross the 80 point threshold and become "excellent". This is also the lowest comprehensive review of media since lanli's "transcendence".

But is 79 really too low? To be exact, it should be that the praise standard of lanli's works is too high, which can be seen from the horizontal comparison of Nolan's other works.

"Memory fragment", 80 points.

Fatal magic, 66 points.

"Batman: the mystery of chivalrous shadow", 70 points.

Batman: The Dark Knight, 84 points.

Batman: the rise of the dark knight, 78 points.

Inception, 74 points.

In other words, the media comprehensive review of "Star Trek" ranks third in Nolan's personal works, next only to "Dark Knight" and "memory fragment", which easily surpasses "Dark Knight rise" and "Inception". Such a score is very rare, so there is no doubt whether the film review population monument is good or bad.

In addition, "Star Trek" can also be included in this year's summer program to compete with the commercial film competitors released at the same time. It is clear where the comprehensive media review with 79 points can be put.

Captain America 2, 70.

Rio Adventure 2, 49.

Super hacker, 42.

Spiderman 2, 53.

Godzilla, 62.

"X-Men: reversing the future", 75 points.

Sleeping curse, 56.

It has been two months since the opening of the summer archives. For large-scale projects with production cost of more than 100 million, only three works have reached the pass line in the comprehensive evaluation of the media. "X-Men: reversing the future" is currently the king of public praise, "Captain America 2" is closely followed, and "Godzilla" has barely reached the landing level.

Now, "Star Trek" is on the stage. With 79 points of evaluation, this work easily surpasses many competitors and becomes the highest comprehensive evaluation work in the media so far. This also proves once again that the partner combination of "Nolan and lanli" is still the guarantee of the work's reputation!

Earlier, Warner Bros. announced that the film was upgraded, which caused numerous speculations. Some people even thought that "Star Trek" was abandoned because of the poor quality of the finished product, which is likely to become the first Waterloo in lenley's career; But now, all the answers are revealed:

This is still one of the most noteworthy works of summer archives in 2014!