When "Wall Street wolf" was screened by Hollywood professionals, the judges of the Academy complained and expressed strong dissatisfaction and protest against the work. Many people in the industry said that "it's a three hour torture". Even a screenwriter rushed to the director Martin Scorsese after the screening and yelled, "you're so disgraceful!"

Since the film was officially released, in just three weeks, the judges of the whole Hollywood academy have been strongly condemning that the "wolf of Wall Street" is struggling to move forward in almost a curse. It is very rare that it has become a work denounced by the academy but still occupies a place in the award season.

If we need to analyze the attitude of the college judges towards the "wolf of Wall Street", it is undoubtedly a very complicated process. The composition of the college judges is the most important factor. The serious aging, white dominated, male dominated and so on lead to the dilemma of single perspective and single point of view of the college, which can not be ignored.

It's like Brokeback Mountain. After many years, it was revealed that many judges once said directly, "I haven't seen this film, but it's absolutely impossible for me to vote for a homosexual work", which created the biggest injustice in the history of "crash" overturning "Brokeback Mountain".

But for the time being, in a way, both Wall Street wolf and Langley are facing the same situation. The former reveals the filth and darkness beneath the bright surface of Wall Street, while the latter is fighting against the erosion and oppression of Wall Street forces. However, Hollywood's attitude towards the two is subtly different.

The reason is simple.

"The wolf of Wall Street" unfolds everything on the surface. It is bold and arrogant, and presents it in a relaxed comic way, which is like exposing all the shame cloth. Although Hollywood supports Martin Scorsese's behavior, it holds different ideas on the way of expression and communication, which leads to rejection.

But in the final analysis, Hollywood finally gave the "wolf of Wall Street" corresponding recognition, and still successfully occupied a place in the award season.

Among the nominations for the Golden Globe Award, "wolf of Wall Street" was nominated for best picture and best actor in musical comedy.

In addition to "American scam" and "wolf of Wall Street", she is undoubtedly one of the most acclaimed literary works of petty bourgeoisie in this year's award season. It reminds people of such relatively light but weighty works as "midnight Paris" or "growth education". In particular, the excellence of the play has been highly praised by all people in the industry.

Finally, "Nebraska" and "drunken folk.".

Interestingly, these two works are the main competition units of this year's Cannes Film Festival. At that time in Cannes, the latter won an overall victory; But back in North America, the former got the upper hand: "Nebraska" had five nominations and became the best troublemaker in the music and comedy department, while "drunken folk" had only three nominations for comfort.

The aesthetic differences between Europe and North America also show up again.

In addition, "Nebraska" is Alexander Penn's work, and his "American scam" with David o-russell is bound to launch a close-up bayonet duel. The only difference between the two works is that "American scam" is an all-star lineup, and there are two more acting nominations than "Nebraska", that's all.

Finally, focus on individual departments.

The best director department, Steve McQueen of twelve years of slavery, Alfonso Caron of gravity, Paul Greengrass of Captain Phillips, David o Russell of American scam and Alexander Penn of Nebraska, became the final competitors.

It is generally believed in the industry that the position of the Cohen brothers was squeezed out by Alexander, which also means that Alexander has taken the lead in the next Oscar battle, and the profile also proves once again that "drunken folk" is still not the type of works preferred by the North American award season, even if the film box office has created a miracle.

Matthew McConnell of Dallas buyers club, Langley Hall of gravity, Chiwetel Ejiofor of 12 years of slavery, Tom Hanks of Captain Phillips and Robert Redford of everything are among the top five.

Among them, chevat egaford won the nomination of best actor in miniseries and TV movies in the TV drama department this year by virtue of "dancing on the edge"; Tom Hanks has been nominated for Golden Globe award again after six years since "Charlie Wilson war" in 2007.

In terms of hard power alone, Matthew, Langley, Tom and Robert are all far ahead. Only Chevalier relies more on the overall momentum of his works to win the nomination. This also means that this year's competition for the film King department will be particularly fierce, not to mention the final prize, and even the nomination stage will not allow any careless confrontation.

However, if the influence of the work is added, then Chevalier, Langley and Tom will rise strongly. Unfortunately, Langley is subject to the sequelae of egot, and Tom is still subject to the stereotype of being ignored when he becomes famous. This also means that Chevalier and Matthew will be the biggest rivals of the film Empire department.

The best actor Department of musical comedy, Leonardo DiCaprio of "Wall Street wolf", "Bruce Dunn of" Nebraska "," her "Jacqueline Phoenix", "drunken folk" Raleigh hall "and" American hoax "Christian bell, form the battle lineup for the film king.

Bruce, who is 76 years old, is the representative of the old actors. Leonardo, Jacqueline and Christian are the representatives of the Mesozoic actors. As the representative of the new generation, Langley's nomination list is obviously richer and more diversified than the drama category. Of course, the competition is more fierce.

In terms of hard power, Bruce, Christian and Langley are the leading groups, but the backwardness of Leonardo and Jacqueline is not too obvious. All the five actors have their own advantages and disadvantages. It's natural to choose any one of them, especially in the music and comedy department. The influence of the works is more important.

But the problem is that the five nominees' works happen to be the nominees of the five best music and comedy films, which also means that their strength is not comparable. Then it depends on the public relations strength of the actors - remember? The nomination depends on strength, and the prize depends on luck.

Just above the Golden Globe Awards, the two departments nominated nine actors in ten. This shows the intensity of this year's battle for the best actor in the Oscars. All the media can't wait to say, "the strongest lineup in ten years.".

Although similar slogans seem to appear every once in a while, this year they are well deserved. All aspects of the industry can feel the stimulation of the battle for movie king. Even if they go all out, they will not be able to win the nomination, let alone the award. Naturally, no one dares to take it lightly.

This year's academy public relations awards season is really wonderful.

It is against this background that Lan Li won the double nominations of movie king. After winning the double nominations with "crazy love" and "anti-cancer me", he won the double nominations of Golden Globe award again. This also proves his strong posture, and the other eight competitors are not disappointed.

"Don't you really choose lanli?" This seems to be a question in everyone's heart in the process of public relations of the college.

Next, it depends on the means of the distribution company. "Gravity" is Warner Brothers, and "drunken folk" is Sony classic. The former is big and the latter is heroic. Perhaps, the two companies will compete with each other, which will further reduce the chance of Lanley winning the nomination. No one can predict the follow-up development before the Oscar nomination list is officially released.

In addition, the film department and supporting departments are almost familiar with the face.

The best actresses in drama category are Kate Blanchett of blue jasmine, Judy Dench of Philomena, Sandra Bullock of big dreamer, Kate Winslet of emotional holiday, Adele exarchopoulos of Adele's life.

The best actresses in musical comedy category are Amy Adams of American hoax, Greta Gerwig of Francis ha, Meryl Streep of August: Orange County, Julie Delby of midnight and Julia Louis Dreyfus of wordless.

Compared with the actor department, this year is a young year for actresses. The overall competitiveness of both the works and the actors themselves is far from equal. Even the competition of music and comedy is more than that of comedy, which is very rare above the Golden Globe Award.

So is the supporting role department. It seems that all the works of this year are in a state of full-blown male protagonists.

Although the Golden Globe awards are all entertainment oriented, as the wind vane of the Oscars, their grasp of the direction of the entire Hollywood film industry is also worthy of affirmation.

This year, too.

Among the new generation, Jennifer Lawrence appeared in the award season lineup for the second year in a row by virtue of the "American scam", while Greta geweg emerged by virtue of the "Francis ha". Coupled with the continuous strong lenley, we can clearly feel that generation Y has gradually gained a firm foothold, but the group strength is still not strong enough.

On the contrary, it was Generation X that realized the counter attack. In addition to Leonardo DiCaprio, jekyn Phoenix, Christian bell, Matthew McConnell, Michael faspin, Bradley Cooper, Amy Adams, Kate Blanchett and others, Jared Leto, Daniel Bruhl The rise of actors such as chevat egafort has also become a scenic spot.

In the past two years, Hollywood has been cheering for the rise of generation Y, but this year, it is obvious that the rising trend of lanli and Jennifer continues to rise, while other actors are slowing down; On the contrary, the X era has shown a warming momentum, which is also an important inspiration for the Hollywood industry!