Chris Hemsworth and Raleigh hall, a comic superhero of Raytheon, were born. His handsome appearance and strong body have won him the love of countless fans; One has created a small world of his own on the road of acting. His elegant temperament and handsome face seem to have become a representative noble actor in Hollywood.

The two actors are strangers because of the "borrowing door".

In fact, after the news incident broke out, Chris's career once fell into a short-term trough. However, relying on the contract of Marvel film for playing Raytheon, he successfully stopped losses in time, and this year ushered in a small outbreak——

Not only will Raytheon 2 be released soon, but also he will play in the biographical film "extreme romance" directed by Ron Howard, which has opened up both commercial and artistic aspects. This is also considered to be an important attempt by Chris to advance towards the award season and open the stage.

In other words, Chris now has a firm foothold in Hollywood. What he seeks is not only a superhero idol position, but also a step further. This shows that the international innovation management company standing behind Chris is obviously looking forward to more. Brad Pitt is the best model for Chris Hemsworth.

International innovation management company, one of the top five brokerage companies in the industry, is fully equipped with the ability to compete with the innovative artists brokerage company. They not only own Chris Hemsworth, but also van diesel, who has joined us for a long time. Even in the face of Lan Li's sweeping momentum, he was not afraid.

But the premise is that if there is no need, they are not willing to take the initiative to stir up trouble. Especially in the past, Langley is challenging the existing pay ceiling on behalf of all Hollywood actors, which is beneficial to all actors and all agency companies. Naturally, international innovation management company will not break down internally.

So, in the past, the news between Raleigh and Chris, Raleigh and diesel has been completely calm and seems to have completely disappeared. This is one of the important reasons.

Of course, for the major media reporters, the status and ability of the two actors are no longer the same level, there is no need to cling to that little bit of the past, and it is meaningless to repeatedly stir up cold food; Most importantly, there was not much interaction between the two actors. Before the premiere of gravity, journalists chose Affleck instead of Chris.

But in fact, the "Chris vs. Langley" duel is obviously much more intense at the end of this year.

"Extreme romantic" was released on September 20. After the Toronto Film Festival, it was officially launched into the award season. In the first week, it was screened in five cinemas and gained a good reputation. In the second week, it was directly added to 2300 cinemas. Unfortunately, the performance of the expansion was not very good. The next week, it was attacked by "gravity", At the end of the third week, the box office plummeted by 55%, which almost brought an end to the awarding season for art films.

Then, three weeks later, on November 8, "Raytheon 2: the dark world" will be released on a large scale in 4000 theaters, aiming at the family market and fans market during the Thanksgiving season, looking forward to reaping good results; But now it is unexpectedly facing the outbreak of "gravity" sweeping market potential on a large scale, and the trend of this year's holiday stalls has suddenly become unpredictable.

Objectively speaking, "extreme romantic" and "Raytheon 2" are not in direct confrontation with "gravity". The box office dispute is completely misplaced and can not be generalized. However, the media have lost their interest. They prefer to hype up the fight between "Affleck vs. lanli" rather than discuss Chen GuZi's problem. This can be regarded as progress, It can also be regarded as retrogression - it depends on whose position we are discussing.

If the media learned of the unexpected confrontation between Langley and Chris at this year's Cannes Film Festival, they might be more interested.

But unfortunately, there is no if. Unknowingly, Langley and Chris have gone on two completely different paths without any involvement.

In addition to the top five works, it is also worth mentioning that Joseph Gordon Levitt's "Don Juan" is the sixth one in this week's box office list. This work is really full of gimmicks and attracts young artists. It was officially released last week, and this week's cumulative box office has exceeded $16 million!

As a reference, the investment cost of this film is only 3 million.

In the first week of October, the North American film market came to an end, and the unexpected situation caused an uproar, while "gravity" became the absolute focus of attention. Everyone was discussing the work - not an exaggerated description, but the literal reality. Everyone participated in the discussion, It seems that we haven't heard of this work, so we are completely behind the tide of the times.

Such a situation is even more noisy than this year's summer holiday. This is definitely the most turbulent work that caused the hot discussion after "Inception" in 2010.

However, the original "Inception" was caused by brain burning, the setting of many dream levels and the suspension of the end of the story, which ignited the discussion enthusiasm of every audience; This time, gravity is not.

It's so simple that there's no room for discussion on some weak plots. What's more, if the brain burning works like "Inception" exceed the general public's ability to accept and understand, and the box office data is not easy to create higher results, then what's the matter with "gravity"?

First, the environment and texture presented by the film are too realistic, far more than any other work on space in history. So, how real is it? Is it more realistic than the weightlessness created by Apollo 13, which was shot in collaboration with NASA?

This is undoubtedly the hottest issue.

Human beings have never stopped exploring space. Even if they have never dreamed of being in space, they will at least wonder what the zero gravity environment looks like. What's more, what's the feeling of spacewalk? What is the earth like when you are in space? What about the stars?

"Gravity" now presents such a magnificent picture. With the double addition of 3D and IMAX, every audience can really feel the shock.

So how much of this is true?

Countless netizens have launched a debate. Enthusiasts of astronomy, physics researchers, theoretical knowledge kings and other enthusiastic netizens can't wait to express their views, and analyze them from all angles and levels to see which pictures are real and which details are wrong in the film.

Just like the original "Inception" general, to express their views, endless debate. Everyone thinks they're experts.

Second, is there a metaphor at the end of the movie?

In fact, from Venice to Toronto to New York, almost every time the creators meet, the audience will inevitably ask about this question, because the performance brought by lanli is too shocking under Alfonso's lens. The emotional agitation completely ignores all the five senses, directly acts on the soul, and truly feels the baptism from the inside out.

After each show, the audience can't help standing up and clapping. That's why!

But Alfonso Caron and Raleigh hall have never responded positively, which is what Raleigh said.

"In the process of the film from conception to shooting, there was a lot of communication between the director and the actors. We were always discussing how to explain the essence of life in the most concise way. From the composition of the camera to the details of the performance, we are carving and adjusting bit by bit.

When we look at the finished product, we realize that our goal has been achieved. Then, the rest of the understanding and reading is left to the audience. Everyone must have their own viewing experience, and you can interpret it at will. This is what we insist on in the process of making movies. "

As Langley said, every audience has its own interpretation.

Some people think that the end is to emphasize the importance of gravity, human beings belong to the earth after all; Some people think that there is no need to over interpret it, just the joy of Ryan's escape from death; Some people think that the film is suggesting that Ryan has escaped the crisis of space, but still has to face the crisis of mountains and forests.

At present, one of the most popular views on social networks is:

The whole movie implies the origin of life, including the composition of the universe similar to the uterus. At the end of the movie, Ryan interprets the process from plankton to reptiles and then to upright walking, presenting the evolution and evolution of life - human beings must rely on gravity to survive, but constantly resist gravity.

Furthermore, from the process of life evolution to the transformation of inner sublimation, the understanding of life by Ryan and Alex is also the core content throughout, which undoubtedly infiltrates the understanding of philosophy and belief into the story, which can be simply summarized as: Why are people born? Where do you come from? Where to go?

Make complaints about this kind of view, but they are "overread" by many ordinary audiences. They think it is just a popcorn movie. The content and the depth of the movie are not so exaggerated. It is not as good as the original "Inception" and "Dark Knight". It is also less than the previous "Afanda".

Praise or refute, but to be sure, the discussion frenzy is far from over. Unconsciously, "gravity" is becoming a phenomenal work.