Chapter 1562

The problem is that with the decline of China's take-off performance, the wind direction of the public opinion field has also changed rapidly.

At the beginning, there were only a few sporadic reports on China's take-off in the capital market, but not long after, a heavyweight economist with a returnee background published an article on the Internet, shelling the business model of China's take-off and frankly saying that China's failure today had been planted as early as 15 years ago.

And extend it to the whole state-owned enterprises to talk about the routine of returning the country and advancing the people.

This heavyweight article is like a starting gun to denounce China's take-off. In an instant, an overwhelming number of comment articles and financial programs have sprung up.

Some people have started from the business model of China's take-off. Zhuang Jianye, the head of the family, has been in charge of China's take-off for more than 20 years. He has contributed to the development from an unknown small factory to a world-famous aviation and aerospace manufacturing group.

However, it is undeniable that with the development of the times, Zhuang Jianye, the superior leader in the early 1980s, inevitably had rigid ideas, coupled with objective overbearing and paternalistic management, which finally led to a series of business failures in China's recent take-off.

The reasons are also explained from the composition of China's take-off product line. Through the demonstration of several examples, the final conclusion is that China's take-off does not grasp a good balance between being too conservative and super radical.

The reason why it is too conservative is that in addition to adhering to the main business of aviation, China's take-off has no interest in other industries, which limits the development of China's take-off. In the current popular words, the road of China's take-off has narrowed.

The super radical is that China's take-off has gone too boldly and ahead in space projects, so that it has consumed too many resources, resulting in too big steps and eggs.

Therefore, if you want China to take off and improve, you still need to carry out diversified development of enterprises. You can try to enter the fields of real estate and bulk commodity trade, at least return blood.

There are also reasons to find out from the investment strategy of China's take-off. For example, in recent years, China's take-off has mainly used its funds for new technology research and development, chip and space exploration and other high-tech fields. As a result, it has consumed a lot of funds, but few achievements, resulting in its lack of ability to resist risks

……

There are many such things. It seems that everyone who can speak in the outside world incarnates into Zhuge Liang, can find the reason for failure from the crisis of China's take-off, then start to extend from the inside to the outside, and finally say a lot of specious truths.

Of course, these are still good. At least they can analyze the truth.

But if there is some public opinion, it is disgusting. It can't even be called public opinion. It's just rumor.

For example, on a forum, some netizens posted a photo of a plane crash. The text description behind it was: "the crash photo of China's take-off fcnb-220 test flight, and the on-site personnel risked their lives."

Then the netizen also vowed to describe the "tragic" situation at that time. Seeing that many netizens were creepy, they went to China's take-off official account to leave messages for explanation.

However, more netizens spread the news, combined with the rhythm of some malicious public intellectuals, China's take-off fcnb-220 aircraft was soon labeled as unsafe, backward technology, low-end and flattering.

Some people even shouted: "I won't sit even if I sit for nothing, because there is only one life!"

Originally, major domestic airlines have been shaken by the big price cuts of new Boeing and Airbus aircraft. Now, they have suddenly removed the insecurity of China's take-off fcnb-220 aircraft, which has become a topic of discussion among the people in the streets, and major airlines are even more hesitant.

After all, word-of-mouth has a great impact on goodwill. Even if airlines support fcnb-220 again, they have to start from their own interests. If fcnb-220 cannot be trusted by the public in terms of security, even if fcnb-220 is better, airlines dare not start.

This is the same as the car. On the high speed, the brakes fail at every turn, and even lead to several fatal accidents. How excellent the car is, it will not be popular. After all, no one will joke about his life.

Seeing the public opinion of doubt surging, Boeing and Airbus naturally took advantage of it and began to hype the safety of their models. What has been successful and safe for tens of thousands of hours; What? Our aim is to safely send you where you want to go

It can be said that the small soft Wen praising Boeing and Airbus and the hard line essay questioning the safety of China's take-off formed a sharp contrast in the public opinion field in late December 2007.

For this reason, China's take-off has not been explained and explained, because the originator of the rumor is full of loopholes. That is to say, the photos of the plane crash are the photos of the 1989 Lockerbie air crash. It also seems to be exposed. It is clear that it is replacing flowers with trees.

As for the content of the article, not to mention, people with a little aviation knowledge can see that it is a completely fabricated fantasy, because the process in reality will not be so casual and lax.

But so what?

The voice of China's take-off has been drowned by irrational netizens. Even if they explain more, they have been labeled as hypocritical excuses by netizens.

Obviously, all this is the result of someone's encouragement behind the scenes. It's not obvious who makes the most profit. Naturally, it's who makes the most profit.

There is no doubt that it is Boeing and Airbus.

Because on December 26, 2007, the day after Christmas, the joint purchase letters of intent of several domestic airlines were released on time as usual.

Boeing became the biggest winner with the intention order of 384 aircraft; Airbus followed with 325, of which Boeing 737-800 and a320er each accounted for more than 80% of the intended orders of Boeing and Airbus.

In contrast, China's take-off fcnb-220 has only 24 aircraft, less than a fraction of Airbus and Boeing.

That's all. The problem is that only these 24 aircraft are purchased by China Tengfei's Tengfei airlines. It means that China Tengfei has turned his left hand over his right hand. Finally, he played lonely and didn't make money at all.

In other words, the foreign sales performance of China's take-off fcnb-220 is an ugly 0!

As soon as the news came out, the share price of take-off civil aircraft listed on a shares directly fell by the limit at the opening, and then fell by the limit for three consecutive trading days, and the share price almost halved.

Later, at the shareholders' meeting at the end of the year, minority shareholders began to challenge China's take-off leadership. Zhuang Jianye, who had not appeared in public for a long time, rarely attended the shareholders' meeting and made a speech for less than 2 minutes. The content is summarized in one sentence: let the bullet fly for a while!

No matter how the society evaluates Zhuang Jianye, Zhuang Jianye's prestige is still in China's take-off. Shareholders have more or less backbone when watching the big man personally stand on the platform. Naturally, they say they will give China more time to take-off.

On January 3, 2008, the cold wave from western Siberia swept the country, and the whole country seemed to be completely frozen by the snow princess!

Zhuang Jianye, who learned the news that day, couldn't help but breathe a sigh of relief: "this bullet is flying!"