Chapter 662

They cling to this point and belittle Jiang Cheng's theory from different angles.

This kind of attack is really tricky, because Jiang Cheng is not good at refuting their words.

They didn't say anything practical, they just used some empty things to belittle his theory, so Jiang Cheng couldn't directly refute the other party's words. His mouth alone can't make everyone believe how valuable his theory is.

The value of this kind of thing is very idealistic, everyone has a different view, just say can't let others believe.

Only when you come up with something practical can you make people believe in the value of this thing.

Jiang Cheng can't catch everyone and tell you that my theory is very valuable and has a great impact on the future.

No one is sure about the future, so Jiang Cheng can't prove the value of this theory immediately.

If Jiang Cheng wants to completely refute those people's views, he has to produce enough evidence to prove the correctness of his theory.

At that time, the value of this theory will naturally appear in front of you.

If his theory is verified, those people's words will be defeated, and he will win this debate completely.

Unfortunately, this theory is not so easy to verify. The research on dark matter has always been very difficult for human beings, and many experiments are quite troublesome.

In the field of observation, it has always been difficult for human beings to thoroughly prove a theory with experiments, and dark matter is no exception.

Even if Jiang Cheng himself designed some ingenious experiments, which can prove his theory from the side, it will take a certain amount of time to complete these experiments.

Now all these experiments are done by Yang Qianqian. Even if you want to be anxious, you can't be anxious.

Jiang Cheng has to wait for some time before he can beat those people's faces.

The reason why those physicists dare to attack Jiang Cheng is that they understand that the theory of dark matter is difficult to prove.

They are not afraid of being beaten in the face by Jiang Cheng's experiment, so they dare to jump out without fear. If they knew that the experiments had been designed now, they would not dare to say so blatantly.

Although Jiang Cheng can't directly refute their words, he can also tell you one thing.

History will always prove the value of this kind of thing, but it often takes a long time to wait.

Jiang Cheng soon made a public speech in response to those who questioned him.

He wants everyone to believe that those who say that this theory has no value are wrong, that history will prove him right, and that day will come soon.

I'm here to tell a mathematical story about a great mathematician.

Robachevsky, a great mathematician, discovered Rogowski geometry, that is, non Euclidean geometry.

It was completely different from the original geometry system of Luo Yan.

At that time, he was given the same treatment as me. All mathematicians did not agree with his theory and thought that his theory was of no value to the development of mathematics.

Even many mathematicians at that time were slandering him, saying that he had been dreaming about unrealistic things.

History has always been amazingly similar, and today I'm being elected just like him.

Robachevsky, as Jiang Cheng said, is a mathematician in the state of Xiong. What he suffered at that time was similar to Jiang Cheng.

Robachevsky found that the fifth axiom of Euclidean geometry was too complex. It was not a complete axiom at all, but a prerequisite.

The fifth axiom of Huanshi geometry says that there is only one straight line parallel to the known straight line at a point beyond the straight line.

This is what we all learned when we were reading, also known as the parallel axiom.

Robachevsky made a hypothesis at that time that there are at least two lines parallel to the known line passing through a point outside the line.

Then we deduce a complete geometric system through this assumption, which is called Rogowski geometry.

This geometric theory really violates many people's cognition, because where we can see this kind of imagination is just a fantasy.

So robachevsky was indifferent to the whole mathematical world at that time, and no one recognized his theory at all.

Because European geometry is too popular, robachevsky's theory violates the old geometry system.

In the end, however, it was proved that on the unit circle, it is equivalent to Euclidean geometry.

Actually, it's just the difference in curvature. They are both right.

The last time gave robachevsky fair treatment, but he had already died for many years.

Jiang Cheng, like him, is questioned by everyone, not even one who agrees with his point of view.

However, his experience is much worse than that of Jiang Cheng. At that time, his theory was directly persecuted by others, so he lost his job in the University.No one dares to do this to Jiang Cheng in reality, so attacking his theory is already the limit.

Jiang Cheng is better than Lobachevsky, just because his influence is so huge that those physicists can't help him.

In terms of Jiang Cheng's current position, it's good that he doesn't persecute others because of academic affairs. Which round will he get persecuted by others. If he wants to target physicists who question him, it's a very easy thing.

As long as Jiang Cheng goes out and says he wants to deal with them, soon someone will come to their trouble. It's very easy for them to lose their jobs.

But Jiang Cheng doesn't want to do that. He thinks that academic things should stay in academic, and it's boring to involve other things.

So when he was waiting for the experiment to be completed, he could only use this way to complain for himself.

By the way, he also complained about robachevsky's injustice. I hope more people can know this great mathematician and how much contribution he made.

When robachevsky was alive, he did not see the day when his theory was accepted.

He passed away with infinite regret, but time proved his greatness and gave him a fair treatment.

"In the end, history has given him enough time to prove that he has made great contributions to the development of mathematics.

So I want to say that history will prove it one day, because history is the fairest.

"Those who question me are just like those who opposed robachevsky.

"One day they will be proved to be ignorant idiots, and I believe that day will come soon.

"At that time, I'll slap them in the face with facts to let them know what the price will be. “