"Your statement is just a guess. Is there any evidence? I don't think you can prove it, can you? So, how do we know if you do it on purpose? The purpose is to get rid of your suspicion? " Dead duck has a hard tongue, which is about the children of these aristocratic families. Of course, it is undeniable that envy, jealousy and hatred also account for part of the reasons, which is also an undeniable fact. Otherwise, how could anyone be so serious and so reckless in trying to deny the reason? That's right, it's more serious, it's just a mess, because if we really think about it according to their ideas, the only result will be more than one. Combined with their identity, status, and background, we can't see what they have that is worth the efforts of others to make trouble for themselves, OK? In other words, pay and return are not equal at all. Which fool, or which idiot will make such an unwise choice when he is full? Well, no one would think that Ouyang Xiasha didn't want to get anything from these people except to muddy the muddy water which was not clear. It has to be said that the brain circuit of the great God is really different from that of ordinary people. Ordinary people are still worrying about the so-called gain and loss, so the great God begins to be happy for himself regardless of the consequences.

As for the feeling of envy, jealousy and hatred, don't doubt it. It's an indisputable fact. Don't think that there is no feeling of envy, jealousy and hatred between alliance allies. If not, how could these named aristocratic families be in such a situation?

To put it more bluntly, all the aristocratic families present can't see that others are better than themselves. As for allies, what is that? Don't you see that some of them belong to the same family? Even people of the same race can play the so-called target, ally or something without hesitation. What kind of ghost is it?! If it's not for the lack of strength and confidence, it's very possible to let them personally attack all the people and let them see the existence of discomfort. What's more, it's just a few words of jostling, aiming at a few, it's just Pediatrics! Therefore, in the envy of hate against these people, want them to have the so-called guilty heart, it is simply a dream, impossible thing.

"I said, is there something wrong with you people! Or do you have that rash delusion of murder? Or a similar disease? Otherwise, why do you always like to think things so complicated? " After all, they are all the children of aristocratic families. Their status, background and identity are not different. It's just the so-called "birds of a feather flock together". Before today, since they can get together, we can imagine what their personalities are like. They are not exactly the same, but they are almost the same. Otherwise, it's certain, How can they get along with each other? They seem to be quite familiar, but at least they have a good relationship. Otherwise, what do you think is the expression of consternation on the faces of those who are called when they hear their names being called? For whom? OK, OK. It's a bit too far away. However, it's obvious that these people who are named are not fuel-efficient lamps. They were guilty before, so they don't want to be serious. However, they are bullied to the head. It's not their nature to be patient again. Therefore, they will no longer worry about sharp retorts. It's not surprising, even to say something Love should have developed in this way, maybe it would be more appropriate.

"What delusion of victimization? What kind of illness? Who are you insulting there? What's the so-called "beating people but not faces" that you can't say well and curse people as soon as you open your mouth I don't know if it's guilty. I'm guilty of my own ugliness. I'm guilty of ignoring morality and their past relationship because of my so-called jealousy and jealousy. I know that all the reasons listed by them have been denied by the other party, but I still insist on planting the other party's reason? Or is it their nature? Growing up in such an environment, what they have always heard is the flattery and flattery of others. When did they hear such obvious abuse, so they were in a bad mood? The former? The latter? Or both? Or is there any other reason? Who knows? Anyway, it's an indisputable fact that those present in front of those named aristocratic families, after hearing the retorts of those named people, immediately became angry and didn't hesitate to squeeze back. Moreover, their emotions don't seem to be pretended. It can be seen that the other party's words really step on the minefield and make them angry. Moreover, they are still the kind of angry. Otherwise, they always pay attention to face and regard face as their appearance. How can they move such an ugly picture to the stage like this? Solve it secretly, that's the most correct way to open it! After all, they are not the only ones present. They are just the members of a family alliance. Even others, the vassal families can be easily suppressed by them, so they can not mention it for the moment. But their enemies, the white family, are still there. Let their enemies see their jokes. Sure enough, they are confused with anger?! Otherwise, how can you make such a low-level mistake?!"Ha ha, I just want to ask you, if we are the same as you, and the storage bag is empty, will you still stare at us, aim at us and squeeze us?" I don't know if I don't like the reaction of the other party. I think they are just making a fuss? Or do you think it's meaningless to pay attention to it, so you are too lazy to pay attention to it? Or is there any other reason? Who knows? In any case, as the representative of the group of people who were named, the person who spoke had nothing to do with the target of the other party, whether it was the topic or the content, except for a sneer at the beginning. If you don't see and experience with your own eyes, I'm afraid that no one will connect the previous group of people with insufficient confidence.

"Probably, maybe one by one" although they don't want to be led by the nose, the other party's attitude and momentum at this time are too tough, which makes them want to refuse. It's no good to refuse intentionally. But their reluctance and resistance in their hearts are not fake. Therefore, under the promotion of full of reluctance and resistance, even if the other party's attitude is no longer tough, there is no other way With the participation of his external force, he formed such a tangled, extremely stalemate, neither refused nor agreed, seemingly with the meaning of reply, but without any meaningful words.

"In all conscience!" Obviously, such hesitation and no substantive answer can not meet the requirements of those who have been named. Therefore, appropriate pressure has become a matter of course. In any case, it has been strong before, so there is no need to care about the problem of being strong again. What's more, this time the pressure is also pressurized, and there's no difference between the two times, isn't it?! You know, with each other's mind that likes to haggle over everything, they won't just because you've pressed once, they won't care with you, or they won't remember your hatred. Similarly, they won't even hate you more because you've pressed twice. Frankly speaking, in their view, there is only the difference between doing and not doing. As for the number of times, what is that? So, there is no difference between the two times!

"Of course not! There is nothing different. If we are not full, why do we have to watch? " Probably with a broken pot broken mentality! Forced to the limit by the other party's momentum and pressure, this group of aristocratic children began to blame the other party. At this moment, they not only chose to answer, but also answered in the affirmative. In addition, they also gave their most real thoughts in view of the other party's question. The gesture, the look and the eyes seemed as if it was stupid for the other party to ask this question. It can be seen that the other party really ignored everything. Otherwise, with their cautious mind, how could they give such a reckless answer?!

"Since we can't, we're not stupid. Why should we make people suspect so much?" Maybe it's too lazy to pay attention? Maybe not at all? Maybe it's a waste of time to haggle with them? Maybe it's meaningless to answer? Maybe there's another reason? Who knows? Anyway, it is an indisputable fact that the group of people who have been named have heard the other party's reply and felt the other party's contempt, but they are still indifferent in the end and don't say a word more about it. However, if they don't say anything about it, it doesn't mean that they really don't have any means to fight back. This seems ordinary, but in fact it contains the rhetorical question of slowly sneering attitude, which is the best way to fight back to the other party. Look at the inside and outside meaning, although there is no explicit statement, although there is no accusation against the other party, but the implied meaning, but it is clearly talking about their own stupid words, but how to see, how to belittle the other party in general, or even say, it is almost impossible to directly say to the other party whether you are stupid, even if you have to ask such a simple question, you have to doubt to doubt, that is not true It's an exaggeration.