Chapter 306

Who else?

I don't know. I thought you Shen Jiarui was the author of the Roger case.

There are people in the circle, but they have to admit that there is nothing wrong with the goods.

It deserves to be the number one Chu blow.

Of course, not all the comments are good. As grandma's most controversial work, Roger's mystery is not polarizing in evaluation, but also some disliked voices --

"the narrative technique is too naughty. In order to shock the ending effect, it sacrifices the brilliance of the case, and feels that it's going from the beginning to the end."

"It's obvious that it's fooling readers, or many people feel very happy to be fooled. It's really clever, but I don't like this kind of reasoning."

"I don't like this kind of writing either, but I also admit that it's really a new way of reasoning creation. I can only pray that the writers I like don't follow suit."

"Reasoning can't be judged by not being able to guess I still like to reason thoroughly, rather than play this kind of word game with writers. "

"The ending is really shocking, but only I find it drowsy to watch it in the early and middle stages?"

"It's really great, but I can't accept this kind of narrative. There's a kind of subtle emotion [it's wonderful, but I've been fooled], and I feel a little bad."

“……”

It's a price to play with readers!

Because not everyone can accept this kind of juggling.

Moreover, there are different types of reasoning, and the deceptive reasoning is just the "poison point" of some reasoning fans.

Grandma also met with many doubts when she launched "Roger's mystery", believing that this article is unfair to readers, and the emergence of new things is to face controversy.

At this point.

It's not only some readers, but also writers who feel poisoned!

Yes, some inferential writers feel that they have been teased after reading Roger's mystery. After reading it, they directly scold Chu Kuang.

Most of the expletives are just two sentences on their lips.

But there are writers who have a natural desire to vent, such as Leng Guang, a famous reasoning writer in Qi province.

The cool light was directly sprayed on the tribe:

"since last night, someone has been recommending to me the Roger mystery. I read it with expectation, but after watching it, I was disappointed. I just want to say, it's a foul!"

Maybe it's too much to say, and the wording is euphemistic, but Lengguang is really dissatisfied.

Leng Guang, a reasoning writer, is famous for his outspokenness, and he also published a "five rules of reasoning".

This code is very popular in the circle.

The speech of the code boss is very influential.

Some of Carter's readers, even if they don't like the Roger case, see that the idol says so, and their inner balance gradually falls to Chu mania:

"think about it carefully, there's nothing wrong with what Mr. Carter said, it's a new type of reasoning."

"I've seen many people say that this style is disgusting. Take a look at Mr. Carter's overall view and see new things from multiple perspectives!"

"Carter has an overall view, because this type will lead to numerous subsequent works of imitation, which is actually a good thing for the future development of reasoning."

"I didn't expect that Carter also liked this book. Hehe, I have the same taste as the idol."

“……”

Leng Guang left a message in the comment area: "I don't agree."

Carter said, "yes."^_ ^”。

By the way, after Lengguang published the five rules of reasoning, Carter took the lead in deleting the fifth rule.

At that time, Carter boasted about the five principles published by Leng Guang. He said that you are great, Xiao Guang Guang. Then he turned around and removed the fifth principle, which became the four principles widely spread in the field of reasoning

Leng Guang almost cried.

He used to like Carter very much, but it turned the cool powder black.

Today, I saw Carter praise "Roger case", cold light myocardial infarction.

With the emergence of some controversies, the official micro blog of the silver blue library has also set out to add an important note to the storm of reasoning:

"Chu Kuang, with his masterpiece Roger's mystery, has opened up a new era of narrative sophistry. The so-called narrative sophistry is the highlight of the inferential novel. There may be more innovative works in the future, but no one knows There is no way to hide the brilliance of Chu Kuang's work! "

Of course, the author of his own family is so desperate!

Silver Blue library is also eager to set the tone, to make an established fact:

Chu maniac in the field of reasoning, with narrative tricks, set up a school!

PS: please ask for a monthly ticket.