Chapter 184

[chapter on anti theft stickers]

the power structure of Hollywood is very complex, which can not be determined simply by one's position.

Usually, if you want to clarify a person's face and potential power, you just need to see which class of Hollywood he reports to. If a studio president is directly responsible to the top management of the parent company, he may have the same power as the CEO. As a big shot director like Spielberg can directly communicate with Steve Roth, his potential influence is still above the CEO of the studio.

Simon was not surprised by Robert REM's proposal.

At this time in Hollywood, Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Frank wells belong to this kind of equal relationship. Both of them are directly responsible to the Disney board of directors. Michael Eisner is one level higher than Frank wells in his position, but in fact, he has no jurisdiction over Frank wells. They have their own cooperation in charge, Michael Eisner Nor is it possible to appoint or remove Frank wells.

According to the information in my memory, Disney's balance of power greatly promoted the rapid rise of Disney in the first decade when Michael Eisner took charge of the big film company.

……

……

Hollywood's power structure is very complex, and can't be judged simply by a person's position.

Usually, if you want to clarify a person's face and potential power, you just need to see which class of Hollywood he reports to. If a studio president is directly responsible to the top management of the parent company, he may have the same power as the CEO. As a big shot director like Spielberg can directly communicate with Steve Roth, his potential influence is still above the CEO of the studio.

Simon was not surprised by Robert REM's proposal.

At this time in Hollywood, Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Frank wells belong to this kind of equal relationship. Both of them are directly responsible to the Disney board of directors. Michael Eisner is one level higher than Frank wells in his position, but in fact, he has no jurisdiction over Frank wells. They have their own cooperation in charge, Michael Eisner Nor is it possible to appoint or remove Frank wells.

According to the information in my memory, Disney's balance of power greatly promoted the rapid rise of Disney in the first decade when Michael Eisner took charge of the big film company.

Hollywood's power structure is very complex, and can't be judged simply by a person's position.

Usually, if you want to clarify a person's face and potential power, you just need to see which class of Hollywood he reports to. If a studio president is directly responsible to the top management of the parent company, he may have the same power as the CEO. As a big shot director like Spielberg can directly communicate with Steve Roth, his potential influence is still above the CEO of the studio.

Simon was not surprised by Robert REM's proposal.

At this time in Hollywood, Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Frank wells belong to this kind of equal relationship. Both of them are directly responsible to the Disney board of directors. Michael Eisner is one level higher than Frank wells in his position, but in fact, he has no jurisdiction over Frank wells. They have their own cooperation in charge, Michael Eisner Nor is it possible to appoint or remove Frank wells.

According to the information in my memory, Disney's balance of power greatly promoted the rapid rise of Disney in the first decade when Michael Eisner took charge of the big film company.

Hollywood's power structure is very complex, and can't be judged simply by a person's position.

Usually, if you want to clarify a person's face and potential power, you just need to see which class of Hollywood he reports to. If a studio president is directly responsible to the top management of the parent company, he may have the same power as the CEO. As a big shot director like Spielberg can directly communicate with Steve Roth, his potential influence is still above the CEO of the studio.

Simon was not surprised by Robert REM's proposal.

At this time in Hollywood, Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Frank wells belong to this kind of equal relationship. Both of them are directly responsible to the Disney board of directors. Michael Eisner is one level higher than Frank wells in his position, but in fact, he has no jurisdiction over Frank wells. They have their own cooperation in charge, Michael Eisner Nor is it possible to appoint or remove Frank wells.

According to the information in my memory, Disney's balance of power greatly promoted the rapid rise of Disney in the first decade when Michael Eisner took charge of the big film company.

Hollywood's power structure is very complex, and can't be judged simply by a person's position.

Usually, if you want to clarify a person's face and potential power, you just need to see which class of Hollywood he reports to. If a studio president is directly responsible to the top management of the parent company, he may have the same power as the CEO. As a big shot director like Spielberg can directly communicate with Steve Roth, his potential influence is still above the CEO of the studio.Simon was not surprised by Robert REM's proposal.

At this time in Hollywood, Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Frank wells belong to this kind of equal relationship. Both of them are directly responsible to the Disney board of directors. Michael Eisner is one level higher than Frank wells in his position, but in fact, he has no jurisdiction over Frank wells. They have their own cooperation in charge, Michael Eisner Nor is it possible to appoint or remove Frank wells.

According to the information in my memory, Disney's balance of power greatly promoted the rapid rise of Disney in the first decade when Michael Eisner took charge of the big film company.

Hollywood's power structure is very complex, and can't be judged simply by a person's position.

Usually, if you want to clarify a person's face and potential power, you just need to see which class of Hollywood he reports to. If a studio president is directly responsible to the top management of the parent company, he may have the same power as the CEO. As a big shot director like Spielberg can directly communicate with Steve Roth, his potential influence is still above the CEO of the studio.

Simon was not surprised by Robert REM's proposal.

At this time in Hollywood, Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Frank wells belong to this kind of equal relationship. Both of them are directly responsible to the Disney board of directors. Michael Eisner is one level higher than Frank wells in his position, but in fact, he has no jurisdiction over Frank wells. They have their own cooperation in charge, Michael Eisner Nor is it possible to appoint or remove Frank wells.

According to the information in my memory, Disney's balance of power greatly promoted the rapid rise of Disney in the first decade when Michael Eisner took charge of the big film company.

Hollywood's power structure is very complex, and can't be judged simply by a person's position.

Usually, if you want to clarify a person's face and potential power, you just need to see which class of Hollywood he reports to. If a studio president is directly responsible to the top management of the parent company, he may have the same power as the CEO. As a big shot director like Spielberg can directly communicate with Steve Roth, his potential influence is still above the CEO of the studio.

Simon was not surprised by Robert REM's proposal.

At this time in Hollywood, Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Frank wells belong to this kind of equal relationship. Both of them are directly responsible to the Disney board of directors. Michael Eisner is one level higher than Frank wells in his position, but in fact, he has no jurisdiction over Frank wells. They have their own cooperation in charge, Michael Eisner Nor is it possible to appoint or remove Frank wells.

According to the information in my memory, Disney's balance of power greatly promoted the rapid rise of Disney in the first decade when Michael Eisner took charge of the big film company.

Hollywood's power structure is very complex, and can't be judged simply by a person's position.

Usually, if you want to clarify a person's face and potential power, you just need to see which class of Hollywood he reports to. If a studio president is directly responsible to the top management of the parent company, he may have the same power as the CEO. As a big shot director like Spielberg can directly communicate with Steve Roth, his potential influence is still above the CEO of the studio.

Simon was not surprised by Robert REM's proposal.

At this time in Hollywood, Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Frank wells belong to this kind of equal relationship. Both of them are directly responsible to the Disney board of directors. Michael Eisner is one level higher than Frank wells in his position, but in fact, he has no jurisdiction over Frank wells. They have their own cooperation in charge, Michael Eisner Nor is it possible to appoint or remove Frank wells.

According to the information in my memory, Disney's balance of power greatly promoted the rapid rise of Disney in the first decade when Michael Eisner took charge of the big film company.

Hollywood's power structure is very complex, and can't be judged simply by a person's position.

Usually, if you want to clarify a person's face and potential power, you just need to see which class of Hollywood he reports to. If a studio president is directly responsible to the top management of the parent company, he may have the same power as the CEO. As a big shot director like Spielberg can directly communicate with Steve Roth, his potential influence is still above the CEO of the studio.

Simon was not surprised by Robert REM's proposal.

At this time in Hollywood, Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Frank wells belong to this kind of equal relationship. Both of them are directly responsible to the Disney board of directors. Michael Eisner is one level higher than Frank wells in his position, but in fact, he has no jurisdiction over Frank wells. They have their own cooperation in charge, Michael Eisner Nor is it possible to appoint or remove Frank wells.According to the information in my memory, Disney's balance of power greatly promoted the rapid rise of Disney in the first decade when Michael Eisner took charge of the big film company.

Hollywood's power structure is very complex, and can't be judged simply by a person's position.

Usually, if you want to clarify a person's face and potential power, you just need to see which class of Hollywood he reports to. If a studio president is directly responsible to the top management of the parent company, he may have the same power as the CEO. As a big shot director like Spielberg can directly communicate with Steve Roth, his potential influence is still above the CEO of the studio.

Simon was not surprised by Robert REM's proposal.

At this time in Hollywood, Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Frank wells belong to this kind of equal relationship. Both of them are directly responsible to the Disney board of directors. Michael Eisner is one level higher than Frank wells in his position, but in fact, he has no jurisdiction over Frank wells. They have their own cooperation in charge, Michael Eisner Nor is it possible to appoint or remove Frank wells.

According to the information in my memory, Disney's balance of power greatly promoted the rapid rise of Disney in the first decade when Michael Eisner took charge of the big film company.

Hollywood's power structure is very complex, and can't be judged simply by a person's position.

Usually, if you want to clarify a person's face and potential power, you just need to see which class of Hollywood he reports to. If a studio president is directly responsible to the top management of the parent company, he may have the same power as the CEO. As a big shot director like Spielberg can directly communicate with Steve Roth, his potential influence is still above the CEO of the studio.

Simon was not surprised by Robert REM's proposal.

At this time in Hollywood, Disney CEO Michael Eisner and President Frank wells belong to this kind of equal relationship. Both of them are directly responsible to the Disney board of directors. Michael Eisner is one level higher than Frank wells in his position, but in fact, he has no jurisdiction over Frank wells. They have their own cooperation in charge, Michael Eisner Nor is it possible to appoint or remove Frank wells.